From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-user+bounces-149618-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
	by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E62911381F3
	for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Thu, 15 Aug 2013 16:38:06 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E3E0BE0C3E;
	Thu, 15 Aug 2013 16:37:58 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-pd0-f170.google.com (mail-pd0-f170.google.com [209.85.192.170])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 72227E0C10
	for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Thu, 15 Aug 2013 16:37:57 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-pd0-f170.google.com with SMTP id x10so1030932pdj.29
        for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Thu, 15 Aug 2013 09:37:56 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id
         :subject:to:content-type;
        bh=WKOG3P7DYndBWpe0A0SEXMVzKzC3/h4Hylvk+dYhFes=;
        b=Ov1MXQZjz4Oevk6TK2nh7CDfkMU/Ea/JygPhB9WCNAnY5n5Oef7naFeHw/MBzCpM4C
         RlBSriyJDhZjgv+zFtLdSY7RnHYoPXGAhk1siJyhPmd9xzXbtkJad7VUsu66tslSkqhn
         mxACTXUQwRMIFgE97T1rOsMmV2j8UeedYLxP8nKRpotqNpmLnVt2PEMXGChioLZk/pa2
         xOPX9M+RlkySmcxg1yOubmJwp6j62hjNOh7SHKzPPqhe6eSsH7lsKuq/F/KBc6RelSVx
         EG6pkfr9m31HQ3zaDj0fLTtyBh0kx3f8HDU9Kfca9o4PusREN2H+HQCxfINuVvlpWDtG
         hVTw==
X-Received: by 10.66.221.8 with SMTP id qa8mr2194076pac.188.1376584676325;
 Thu, 15 Aug 2013 09:37:56 -0700 (PDT)
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: paul.hartman@gmail.com
Received: by 10.70.88.239 with HTTP; Thu, 15 Aug 2013 09:37:36 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <20130815155439.GA5989@waltdnes.org>
References: <20130802203646.GA3926@linux1> <20130814084336.1c295d16@dartworks.biz>
 <20130814172401.284a6112@hactar.digimed.co.uk> <20130815155439.GA5989@waltdnes.org>
From: Paul Hartman <paul.hartman+gentoo@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2013 11:37:36 -0500
X-Google-Sender-Auth: Ezkqa1TbZ7zV33Opc_1mTdm9BYw
Message-ID: <CAEH5T2MEVKuFOH2GmJK4QPvaXyGLui06Ytg6vEV8YGuqZ-wjPw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] OpenRc-0.12 is coming soon
To: Gentoo User <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-Archives-Salt: 72f1e6dd-409d-4d78-873f-0f6788e03edf
X-Archives-Hash: c5cb04f948ea87627a6a88b3efa9cfca

On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 10:54 AM, Walter Dnes <waltdnes@waltdnes.org> wrote:
> WTF is the openrc ebuild doing deleting
> /etc/conf.d/net ?!?!?  In many cases, removing a package will not remove
> its config file.

The ebuild doesn't touch it, as far as I can tell. But you are right,
portage shouldn't remove a file if it has been changed, as far as I
know. /etc/conf.d/net is not owned by any package anymore, so maybe
that plays into it as well.