From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84BC4138911 for ; Fri, 8 Feb 2013 16:03:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id AE26F21C028; Fri, 8 Feb 2013 16:03:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-vb0-f47.google.com (mail-vb0-f47.google.com [209.85.212.47]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DDBDF21C010 for ; Fri, 8 Feb 2013 16:03:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-vb0-f47.google.com with SMTP id e21so2399354vbm.20 for ; Fri, 08 Feb 2013 08:03:08 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=FEmWXv8cJUcnKuXZhy6ETPM9Yyw6lfQpzSOTEfrE01E=; b=a79TRUq/HpjE8ju4CwSiVx9L3l+j/jZtebYQQfTcVUZB4cUXypR6EJ0Knc6OykStpo 9C7TTanxTZ5fQwYvjW45eIjayt03VocC+OKJoSgZ6DCanAFGh3IRtEpNqf2wtd6XqznJ xN4C17R+3sPbj0JrZ3FjM2VJFJbC6vebtxu9fQVWBKHGqlzUh1Nnefyt4gkBprPY6zjx xRKEhsoVu8IRTEVhujvbDYEYmc8U7rB0tTUKg9CCFmRIyOVGcSHnPYFfjMxnOWTdT448 wCWfTF5FUOdMOEwWOTL+TQ2aWq4OYWVkIgy2RQkRxWANj0B2jVBHKBKPcUZ0Vjkh1r7i jRAQ== X-Received: by 10.52.179.136 with SMTP id dg8mr6564154vdc.81.1360339385501; Fri, 08 Feb 2013 08:03:05 -0800 (PST) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: paul.hartman@gmail.com Received: by 10.58.209.201 with HTTP; Fri, 8 Feb 2013 08:02:44 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <51141E97.3080304@libertytrek.org> References: <20130203185145.4008d87f@weird.wonkology.org> <5113E717.7020402@libertytrek.org> <201302071753.56717.peter@humphrey.ukfsn.org> <51141466.3030109@libertytrek.org> <51141E97.3080304@libertytrek.org> From: Paul Hartman Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2013 10:02:44 -0600 X-Google-Sender-Auth: LwTCRC1s9lPQdCMHji_P_wbgyjM Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] udev-191 bit me. Insufficient ptys To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Archives-Salt: 9301b050-56a2-427b-a143-a92624b380af X-Archives-Hash: c4dc698313318f060b530b7c5efe7800 On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 3:37 PM, Tanstaafl wrote: > On 2013-02-07 4:25 PM, Paul Hartman wrote: >> >> On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 2:53 PM, Tanstaafl >> wrote: >>> >>> I think that a lot of people will misread that like I (we) did... > > >> I believe he is correct and /dev/shm is irrelevant for this discussion. > > > Ok, thanks, but... and no offense... > > I am not willing to gamble on breaking a remotely accessed server based on > someone's 'I believe that this is correct' comment. No offense at all, it's your system and you make the call. My story was anecdotal, not authoritative. :)