From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCB441389E3 for ; Fri, 31 Oct 2014 06:38:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4CF59E0883; Fri, 31 Oct 2014 06:37:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ie0-f179.google.com (mail-ie0-f179.google.com [209.85.223.179]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E5BD4E0804 for ; Fri, 31 Oct 2014 06:37:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ie0-f179.google.com with SMTP id rl12so691922iec.10 for ; Thu, 30 Oct 2014 23:37:57 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=RDsnjbn3CuwrelvLMXTa6RfU9NfXl/wuwNJR4Wk7Y5A=; b=Wm6aprkqZ1TrfHSiKJ3o3S+MGOvzy3W0t8Q8lBhpfQgzPg6MO8r56ylyr0yygAYiKt lMiVRcwLeyPKJvUDgzAUHhDujSKkOnYz1O/ySyCtmqOSFCIkGVreMP6SWmhsqZMBDSe1 MamI5GRQyVmG9hTpYROPk4emtLnRCN5U21brdGtDOkTK9AERhhLLw4GYgVe04vK2wumK xQCWYCWK1CuDGQwR8pRdSjGS8ZrIdG8UxlorRvdJdboHN7TFgiswLp4elHnK84Ct1h5k zsJUQO93ncG10k7anDoxH3WM88XIeZSEWVf28bfL3sNwfRgsX+9IyQixJvBIa5tszXah xidg== X-Received: by 10.42.129.140 with SMTP id q12mr7350138ics.68.1414737477102; Thu, 30 Oct 2014 23:37:57 -0700 (PDT) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.107.29.148 with HTTP; Thu, 30 Oct 2014 23:37:35 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1721456.cxhDToZz1Z@andromeda> References: <2265905.6YBfFOx5f1@andromeda> <1721456.cxhDToZz1Z@andromeda> From: =?UTF-8?B?Q2FuZWsgUGVsw6FleiBWYWxkw6lz?= Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2014 00:37:35 -0600 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] alternative kernels To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Archives-Salt: 87fb3ad7-63b3-482c-b9b6-d929ce89f88e X-Archives-Hash: bd606cb94fae17e44cefbdcbabd2f4ab On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 12:30 AM, J. Roeleveld wrote: > On Thursday, October 30, 2014 06:31:25 AM Rich Freeman wrote: >> On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 3:56 AM, J. Roeleveld wrote= : >> > On Sunday, October 26, 2014 02:16:24 PM Canek Pel=C3=A1ez Vald=C3=A9s = wrote: >> >> And with systemd, rebooting to a new kernel takes just a few seconds = ;) >> > >> > And here I was thinking that the pro-systemd crowd doesn't care about = the >> > boot-time of systemd? >> > (See the " [OT} Linus Torvalds on systemd" thread around 18 - 21 >> > september) >> > >> > Please make up your mind on this. >> >> This might come as a bit of a shock, but people use Gentoo for >> different reasons, run different init systems, different udev >> implementations, and so on. Well, believe it or not, systemd users >> are exactly the same way and use different components of systemd for >> different reasons. People also drive different types of cars, for >> different reasons. > > I agree on this. But in the thread I mentioned, Mark David Dumlao was qui= te > aggressive in his wording when the subject was brought up and he claimed > systemd proponents don't care. Canek is the biggest proponent for systemd= on > this list. You should have answered then to Mark, not to me, given that I did not said anything in that sub-thread. But if it makes you happy, I will try to take notes in the next Big SystemD Evil Conspiracy Meeting so in the future I do not contradict any statement from anyone in the Pure Evil Directorate. Regards. --=20 Canek Pel=C3=A1ez Vald=C3=A9s Profesor de asignatura, Facultad de Ciencias Universidad Nacional Aut=C3=B3noma de M=C3=A9xico