From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1S7uHD-00033f-IK for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 14 Mar 2012 19:54:27 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 23337E039A; Wed, 14 Mar 2012 19:54:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-pz0-f52.google.com (mail-pz0-f52.google.com [209.85.210.52]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9184AE08E8 for ; Wed, 14 Mar 2012 19:53:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: by dadp12 with SMTP id p12so3429039dad.11 for ; Wed, 14 Mar 2012 12:53:18 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=CShC595AVTJYlUmkS5mQF7CzloG9LLAALiTwSctJw4s=; b=U2IlZQQGGXpYKAtVRlSBnsPUjQyhF3NsDen61Yke5pJ0vuhI4KI8arP0XoWnI9xybV SGicMq6/HWdGMoZ7hG//vWu+aJL9YO3dN226u+iy+95SJCr9rJuVqOBH0ciXeefFbHe0 OPCsst2icpBwO9Wret8yGaPyPoF7eFJ8a+W/dPquQj86nqKAjqZrzAAKjntLu7GWLAzN Hvyi77LsL9jsJ/06uaRpW9g84A/VKyhPBc96WLm8u0Cyo3/kWPvIQgTQaAK97l6FlxyL C87g6C0I/uBlNqfeLbjastDjItokBRBECzAUzbAGZmAE8z/IgX2CZs8YKDAIy1jsRtVm HroQ== Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.68.216.132 with SMTP id oq4mr4552456pbc.41.1331754797960; Wed, 14 Mar 2012 12:53:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.68.197.41 with HTTP; Wed, 14 Mar 2012 12:53:17 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <20120313130534.GB3457@acm.acm> <20120313190052.GA2430@waltdnes.org> <20120313194727.GB2536@acm.acm> <20120313210737.GD2536@acm.acm> <20120313213330.78c5ebf7@digimed.co.uk> <20120313222019.GE2536@acm.acm> <20120313230358.GF2536@acm.acm> <20120314151620.GB24395@acm.acm> Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2012 13:53:17 -0600 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Beta test Gentoo with mdev instead of udev; version 5 - failure :-( From: =?UTF-8?B?Q2FuZWsgUGVsw6FleiBWYWxkw6lz?= To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Archives-Salt: 02c54090-4065-40da-8b5d-94565441284a X-Archives-Hash: f6eb4acadae37431eeb42071c1b5cda9 On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 1:41 PM, Michael Mol wrote: [ huge snip ] > Each time, you've acted as though the new stance is what you've been > arguing from all along, but because you haven't communicated that, > it's impossible to reasonably discuss specifics in practicality. I > think I'm done with this particular discussion. I think I'm done too. I just stated my opinion; do whatever you want with it. Including ignoring it, of course. Regards. --=20 Canek Pel=C3=A1ez Vald=C3=A9s Posgrado en Ciencia e Ingenier=C3=ADa de la Computaci=C3=B3n Universidad Nacional Aut=C3=B3noma de M=C3=A9xico