From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-user+bounces-150205-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
	by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1BA51381F3
	for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Fri, 30 Aug 2013 14:28:36 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9FDA2E0DA9;
	Fri, 30 Aug 2013 14:28:29 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-la0-f49.google.com (mail-la0-f49.google.com [209.85.215.49])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 76AA7E0D26
	for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Fri, 30 Aug 2013 14:28:28 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-la0-f49.google.com with SMTP id ev20so1536725lab.8
        for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Fri, 30 Aug 2013 07:28:26 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        bh=xVgLanfPfGfpjTRmFU91QpI89kAdVn4FCY0tPoTcKk8=;
        b=RTZSSzpQLWiZleXh9O7UQLOrdNYv4iUSaO8I1yHZ3WeKEYbh0K9ZQ+5cJp7Yl40JbV
         p+UlXFQPzRcEKtsvcQo8pufxUl7Id2RQIpgJfBSDX7gL+Y0eBP12bOb1gdcjWHHnS2sB
         aVSTjFwZpQK3ygJVWHOeIObYcUTKTkflk7udVHYgSYF+PHj3HVuKuxqZZz0tcqy7rs32
         vimAFkXCB7DNzH+dLJGioJpYaX3vEkB7b+D3gW5d8YkLxJyDfGlBtc3/icr1ps0aMJd/
         P1Y+RFL/11g04JEeQfrLFNidBIdDGDCTudbzn65Tq74UOzo8g4J05wbGamzAHL/ehMNW
         1Zpg==
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.152.88.20 with SMTP id bc20mr1935640lab.37.1377872906736;
 Fri, 30 Aug 2013 07:28:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.114.96.2 with HTTP; Fri, 30 Aug 2013 07:28:26 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <5220A68D.1080407@libertytrek.org>
References: <87r4dcbisz.fsf@nyu.edu>
	<CADPrc82JPq_EoGB-crgWYFk3MMSMVUm8jvn=vMJyJbymBdqMkg@mail.gmail.com>
	<87sixschz7.fsf@nyu.edu>
	<CADPrc83_WQ7nv2OsOju7QH-HyftSJTGk_2K5menHM39KC7CM5A@mail.gmail.com>
	<87wqn4ar3w.fsf@nyu.edu>
	<d6693248-5a42-46df-8152-ae4561586013@email.android.com>
	<CADPrc83fEG0HgfNYn4KoLKh7xCQRNJ7dWAaKR-brDBCN7A7n6w@mail.gmail.com>
	<52203746.3090203@gmail.com>
	<522046B3.3060209@gmail.com>
	<5220A68D.1080407@libertytrek.org>
Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2013 09:28:26 -0500
Message-ID: <CADPrc83CcOS221CXt=ZrSNJhWR16VcYkdbMOuv6N0Rw3SPr9Eg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] where did lvm installation guide go?
From: =?UTF-8?B?Q2FuZWsgUGVsw6FleiBWYWxkw6lz?= <caneko@gmail.com>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Archives-Salt: aacff5e4-f620-4bc6-9681-9600880ce544
X-Archives-Hash: 1bc941c6341c99e0abb9a0294f5cb68c

On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 9:05 AM, Tanstaafl <tanstaafl@libertytrek.org> wrot=
e:
> On 2013-08-30 3:16 AM, Dale <rdalek1967@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Example, don't want a init thingy, put / on a regular partition and
>> normal file system, just make sure you won't fill it up for a very
>> long time. Of course /boot has to be on a regular file system too.
>
>
> Well, apparently this now includes /usr, as from what I gleaned from the
> earlier thread, there is no guarantee even eudev will continue to support
> separate /usr partition in future (since gentoo council has formally vote=
d
> to NOT support it without an initramfs)...

udev/eudev has nothing to do with it. It's the init systems (as in
both systemd and OpenRC) the ones that are pushing/have pushed for
dropping support for it. In Gentoo, the move is being championed by
William Hubs:

http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.project/2946

He's the OpenRC maintainer. NOBODY who has actually worked on the
problem wants to support a separate /usr without an initramfs, because
it makes no sense.

So it doesn't matter if you use udev, eudev, mdev or even a static
/dev directory; no init system wants to support a separate /usr
without an initramfs.

And for a good reason: is braindead.

Regards.
--=20
Canek Pel=C3=A1ez Vald=C3=A9s
Posgrado en Ciencia e Ingenier=C3=ADa de la Computaci=C3=B3n
Universidad Nacional Aut=C3=B3noma de M=C3=A9xico