From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75E2B138E20 for ; Thu, 20 Feb 2014 05:43:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9DE94E0B58; Thu, 20 Feb 2014 05:43:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-la0-f54.google.com (mail-la0-f54.google.com [209.85.215.54]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6507FE0AD2 for ; Thu, 20 Feb 2014 05:43:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-la0-f54.google.com with SMTP id y1so972669lam.41 for ; Wed, 19 Feb 2014 21:43:17 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=ljPjO8u4s0EmKwuw9CTVwIur1GOjlZguwRFBHIbPG80=; b=JRnLZqwKX/EXiVD2kQZbxBQRl4FXlWthaCfuJt9mkJFocPKA08ZIOhGbgbwFhsL67p rRevdKj63INTAnxbzncL5AT70qrcTIypnDa7aTYVby2Px5J24e1sqd/tYbHryyX7DmmH Iz7UJbvNxVD3xtBR5tbUvPRSUWYQR+Ol/ORuo7spqM5g87SgxYtj6fy0q9XNgCIMvp12 1WwIB+EgQhH/Qm5TvJVyXG3M4ZXEAoVPF5lA5VUGcoCsKxkKdj1C/xxwEh9w5aySFPwv aczHPH/NQmlhpdD/3XjejqZprjJ9kXiuYzg8gtxzgz6UvEwcy2TN9rzAZrYxULDZrJYW fyyQ== Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.152.120.37 with SMTP id kz5mr28458010lab.30.1392874997763; Wed, 19 Feb 2014 21:43:17 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.114.170.67 with HTTP; Wed, 19 Feb 2014 21:43:17 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <5304A5DE.4050905@libertytrek.org> References: <52FF84CE.2050301@libertytrek.org> <201402152023.10543.michaelkintzios@gmail.com> <5300DD51.5060207@libertytrek.org> <53010A8E.2050909@googlemail.com> <53012691.6040503@googlemail.com> <20140217215255.5766cb026df2f0b8002f8702@gmail.com> <5302c048.462f0e0a.3d3e.5888@mx.google.com> <20140218210633.d25f4bb88b3891f7c0ed11c6@gmail.com> <20140218220712.9ec8d2529ef49d743b3bc826@gmail.com> <5304576E.4000704@sporkbox.us> <5304A5DE.4050905@libertytrek.org> Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2014 23:43:17 -0600 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Debian just voted in systemd for default init system in jessie From: =?UTF-8?B?Q2FuZWsgUGVsw6FleiBWYWxkw6lz?= To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Archives-Salt: acf0faa0-f666-4469-be19-c2bcec40afbc X-Archives-Hash: 9c7b54ff097eaf026b821101f37d8217 On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 6:38 AM, Tanstaafl wrot= e: > On 2014-02-19 2:04 AM, Daniel Campbell wrote: >> >> For such a profile to be legitimate, systemd would have to be chosen as >> the default. > > Ridiculous. Forget about Canek's rant... > > This is about *choice*. Also, I would argue the *opposite of what Canek i= s > saying in this last rant... Tanstaafl, can we please not use terms like "rants"? I'm just giving my opinion, trying to be respectful and civil to the others participants in this thread. I would appreciate if you do the same to me. > If he and other want systemd profiles, let *them* do the work of creating > and maintaining them. And as I said on [1], I agree; lets have a systemd profile... which apparently it basically already exists[2]. (I snip the rest, since I don't really disagree with it). Regards. [1] http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.user/272694 [2] http://sources.gentoo.org/cgi-bin/viewvc.cgi/gentoo-x86/profiles/target= s/systemd/ --=20 Canek Pel=C3=A1ez Vald=C3=A9s Posgrado en Ciencia e Ingenier=C3=ADa de la Computaci=C3=B3n Universidad Nacional Aut=C3=B3noma de M=C3=A9xico