From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1S6TR4-00085w-4X for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 10 Mar 2012 21:02:42 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C8177E06D9; Sat, 10 Mar 2012 21:02:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-pz0-f53.google.com (mail-pz0-f53.google.com [209.85.210.53]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B78D4E061F for ; Sat, 10 Mar 2012 21:01:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: by dady25 with SMTP id y25so3501393dad.40 for ; Sat, 10 Mar 2012 13:01:23 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=nFxyQvzjYXUrrb13U0ZQ6BUKqJlCsHADbM1Bm97pLtQ=; b=TVncXG58d2RzJywf7x9fgEV5KmZI8ZxrAHGCWeLTZMMN7V80MOx//sY01BRHVYGB1v o/WxGsgn35Zo0bU6q2h14MXey0ghGhLKW7YvZDfuBBtnb6cFIZHIm9EQ05CO2N1t/31Z CEnF52ROPTkCrVtb84SKqoDlijDATaeOnNCz57y/p9/UPFzLruzivCWI7QDK54Vut6sZ /7/8ZeGuCdpStHJHche8mmZQex21hsSW3ortr99UfAgZqlb4HOtBnlXQPMojz8anZovZ 0FhW/+X/RbE+vrqjuIpB1jCXuGng4pJtnin2JU5zl49JVqdyfDEB2IyAlG2eUJ15EPaZ Ld0A== Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.68.74.74 with SMTP id r10mr11309474pbv.83.1331413283035; Sat, 10 Mar 2012 13:01:23 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.68.59.231 with HTTP; Sat, 10 Mar 2012 13:01:23 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4F5BBE7A.8040802@coolmail.se> References: <4F5AC0F6.6000804@gmail.com> <4F5B33CA.2020705@coolmail.se> <20120310153540.5194cd7c@digimed.co.uk> <4F5BBE7A.8040802@coolmail.se> Date: Sat, 10 Mar 2012 15:01:23 -0600 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] LVM, /usr and really really bad thoughts. From: =?UTF-8?B?Q2FuZWsgUGVsw6FleiBWYWxkw6lz?= To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Archives-Salt: 0fc0197e-dfdf-41eb-98f2-cba4c79075e5 X-Archives-Hash: db79a60334770ba41857f9d2d59ef06a On Sat, Mar 10, 2012 at 2:50 PM, pk wrote: > On 2012-03-10 16:35, Neil Bothwick wrote: > >> I'm using the latest testing with a separate /usr and no problems. > > So udev-181 (masked) is ok to use without initrd and separate /usr > then? Thanks for the info! That's one case; I would not take it for granted that it would work in any other case. The fact is, udev upstream does not support a separated /usr without an initramfs since . That Neil got it working may be a fluke, good luck, the phase of the moon, or all from above combined. If you plan to keep a separated /usr and refuse to use an initramfs, I would recommend sticking to the last version *you* know for sure it works, or risk getting a nasty surprise at some upgrade. Regards. --=20 Canek Pel=C3=A1ez Vald=C3=A9s Posgrado en Ciencia e Ingenier=C3=ADa de la Computaci=C3=B3n Universidad Nacional Aut=C3=B3noma de M=C3=A9xico