From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-user+bounces-149054-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C0341381F3
for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Mon, 29 Jul 2013 17:03:45 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4FFDBE0B0C;
Mon, 29 Jul 2013 17:03:39 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-la0-f50.google.com (mail-la0-f50.google.com [209.85.215.50])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 220ACE0AEB
for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Mon, 29 Jul 2013 17:03:37 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-la0-f50.google.com with SMTP id fn20so282008lab.23
for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Mon, 29 Jul 2013 10:03:36 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
bh=UIucHg/4NJDTSOE4okwd9l3DwfSL+8GJ/eZmjxKw0pc=;
b=OHMRGD6oq3do3jzIfD7tdnfGVei/Pg6X9ZqQQfWVa0QzDyMPu4nYnnJshjetpUwoW/
bH5rRRkmj+7aTgrwd4yzgsVADpPNm9cxniAj/qqrQgW0mPAzyacYLAqpuvJ7kmc5QEX/
35iCYreI29BMidrdYBgybyt61i3KeetTfS4dkixiwL2bDGUYWPFaJ+UJsFkWtffNttBw
yiWBEhz8etdNEXS7wY4YxphGujqSVuXH6vSyqRrfEYaaQkjYsRa1dVjlZDOwXQgochCc
X5hw+Vc6uugAjovUwk5DRqXtKwBXQ2JkCPinZxTODRKV7+EOtqQL6pdFE8QtmYG9qevA
YHEA==
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.152.5.227 with SMTP id v3mr27408345lav.31.1375117416261;
Mon, 29 Jul 2013 10:03:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.114.96.2 with HTTP; Mon, 29 Jul 2013 10:03:36 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <1375086499.28356.2.camel@siegeengine>
References: <kt1eum$rf4$1@ger.gmane.org>
<CADPrc80uEeo=e6nvak1KXfcbsH9D_TOW7M-+R98T4B6B7Y=6Og@mail.gmail.com>
<51F45029.8030903@gmail.com>
<CADPrc80NWYvGEQGey9CTzZZ-T_iRhgnEx2M7Fa8-yUc6M1wdbA@mail.gmail.com>
<51F4D14A.4000309@xunil.at>
<51F51B66.7040004@hadt.biz>
<CADPrc829_MrBAUSt9whTkOX61+ZjZm4OvBkeM9pFJXBH95bBng@mail.gmail.com>
<1375086499.28356.2.camel@siegeengine>
Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2013 12:03:36 -0500
Message-ID: <CADPrc82dAWL1m4byAHSLWrAWmWNT6L1hJ_J1rRtEgr5pmdGEYg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: [~amd64] Some possibly (?) helpful hints re the
big gnome-3.8 update
From: =?UTF-8?B?Q2FuZWsgUGVsw6FleiBWYWxkw6lz?= <caneko@gmail.com>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Archives-Salt: deb5e9c0-e121-44c6-a0dd-13ba28f257b8
X-Archives-Hash: faab637b8b59f8ce286db1a8e2de0d1a
On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 3:28 AM, Mark Pariente <markpariente@gmail.com> wro=
te:
> On Sun, 2013-07-28 at 11:16 -0500, Canek Pel=C3=A1ez Vald=C3=A9s wrote:
>> On Sun, Jul 28, 2013 at 8:23 AM, Michael Hampicke <mh@hadt.biz> wrote:
>> > Am 28.07.2013 10:07, schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger:
>> >> Am 28.07.2013 10:04, schrieb Canek Pel=C3=A1ez Vald=C3=A9s:
>> >>
>> >>> The only "special" thing I'm doing is to mask >sys-apps/systemd-204,
>> >>> since 205 introduced the new cgroups management code (with systemd a=
s
>> >>> the only writer of the cgroups hierarchy), and it seems to cause som=
e
>> >>> minor problems with logind. Other than that, it works withouth a
>> >>> glitch: gnome-base/gnome-3.8.0, sys-apps/systemd-204, no consolekit =
at
>> >>> all.
>> >>
>> >> Same here, yes. I run systemd-206 but I didn't notice an problem(s) y=
et.
>> >> Maybe there are some and I don't get it ;-)
>> >>
>> >
>> > I had one problem, but I am not sure, if it's related to systemd > 204=
,
>> > the removal of consolekit, or gnome at all.
>> >
>> > But when logging into my gnome session, /usr/libexec/gvfsd-fuse can no=
t
>> > be started, because the permissions of /dev/fuse are rw------ root:roo=
t
>> >
>> > Other distros like ubuntu have a fuse group for that, which does not
>> > exist on gentoo. So I assume the default permissions for /dev/fuse on
>> > gentoo machines should be rw-rw-rw- root:root?
>>
>> My problem was that *sometimes* (not always) I was unable to unlock my
>> session after suspending my laptop or desktop. Reverting back to
>> systemd-204 solved it, so I'm assuming that's the problem, although I
>> didn't really investigated the issue.
>
> This turned out to be an upstream issue. See:
>
> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D67267
Yeah, I suspected so; that was my theory in the mail I sent yesterday:
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.user/267762
So it is indeed the new slices code. I'm staying on 204 until 207 comes out=
.
Regards.
--=20
Canek Pel=C3=A1ez Vald=C3=A9s
Posgrado en Ciencia e Ingenier=C3=ADa de la Computaci=C3=B3n
Universidad Nacional Aut=C3=B3noma de M=C3=A9xico