From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-user+bounces-159806-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55A84138825
for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Tue, 11 Nov 2014 05:35:56 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8A3DAE0A7C;
Tue, 11 Nov 2014 05:35:49 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-ie0-f180.google.com (mail-ie0-f180.google.com [209.85.223.180])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4A45DE0A6E
for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Tue, 11 Nov 2014 05:35:48 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-ie0-f180.google.com with SMTP id y20so10897849ier.11
for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Mon, 10 Nov 2014 21:35:47 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to
:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
bh=8CkY5T/yVZ0G078C+1tA0pPMVHnIGaDbIQ0zZuAvMDw=;
b=ShLJQirGdjazfHg0YvxhsS9R1w2JdWOYSP1Rr9+0tXgzXkurmmodpSc0tXKtwWez/s
jmA8JcmJqld78bV8AS74ZEXE5kBX1TEWgSgeTnZRwXimTfScb2NsXPH1HHIJrIxA+Rrh
r5S+HSCA/eND05WMCfyGYRrCm78Y+ksqv8Gke9x6dPVZnkPeve04fARMKLaEm1IGqHCe
mLQEcb7t7uYFQFxCTiDS30qJP/gEHjxrm+uYe6THAc+TkbzMV7wbcDYkVe7H8Z3P5vxQ
vLZh0Lzvt+SKvJTph5yxWghPLKiqrYJdfHzDo5ukbrCEnziZ4fFWxWg9ZdnVZgvVgJxZ
veZA==
X-Received: by 10.50.3.67 with SMTP id a3mr29716628iga.42.1415684147504; Mon,
10 Nov 2014 21:35:47 -0800 (PST)
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.107.29.148 with HTTP; Mon, 10 Nov 2014 21:35:27 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <20141111052026.GA2194@waltdnes.org>
References: <loom.20140925T172011-995@post.gmane.org> <54245C36.50507@gentoo.org>
<loom.20140925T205754-368@post.gmane.org> <5424F3F2.2020808@gentoo.org>
<54609BD1.2000206@libertytrek.org> <5460DE61.20008@gentoo.org> <20141111052026.GA2194@waltdnes.org>
From: =?UTF-8?B?Q2FuZWsgUGVsw6FleiBWYWxkw6lz?= <caneko@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2014 23:35:27 -0600
Message-ID: <CADPrc82ckZMq9t3FprfBGThWBdF31PHbNoxyVq3t-w2nAwc9WA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: udev (viable) alternatives ?
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Archives-Salt: 6fe6a091-83f4-49f2-b0bf-fc18f52bca1a
X-Archives-Hash: b7426bca6326e8b523cc1381dc39295a
On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 11:20 PM, Walter Dnes <waltdnes@waltdnes.org> wrote=
:
> On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 05:48:49PM +0200, Samuli Suominen wrote
>
>> I wouldn't worry about it at all, there is no way *sys-fs/udev ebuild*
>> will ever need systemd. There might be a news item later, with
>> instructions on moving to something else, but that's not something we
>> are even planning at the moment, so sys-fs/udev is still the de facto
>> proper upstream /dev manager.
>
> What worries me is that Lennart has been able to get modifications
> done to the kernel, e.g. kdbus. I know this'll sound paranoid, but how
> long before he pushes a patch that requires systemd to run the linux
> kernel?
Then you can take the very last commit to Linus' Git repository before
that hypothetical change, and fork the Linux kernel into whatever
direction your crazy heart desires.
Business as usual in the Free Software world.
Regards.
--=20
Canek Pel=C3=A1ez Vald=C3=A9s
Profesor de asignatura, Facultad de Ciencias
Universidad Nacional Aut=C3=B3noma de M=C3=A9xico