From: "Canek Peláez Valdés" <caneko@gmail.com>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: udev (viable) alternatives ?
Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2014 23:35:27 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CADPrc82ckZMq9t3FprfBGThWBdF31PHbNoxyVq3t-w2nAwc9WA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20141111052026.GA2194@waltdnes.org>
On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 11:20 PM, Walter Dnes <waltdnes@waltdnes.org> wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 05:48:49PM +0200, Samuli Suominen wrote
>
>> I wouldn't worry about it at all, there is no way *sys-fs/udev ebuild*
>> will ever need systemd. There might be a news item later, with
>> instructions on moving to something else, but that's not something we
>> are even planning at the moment, so sys-fs/udev is still the de facto
>> proper upstream /dev manager.
>
> What worries me is that Lennart has been able to get modifications
> done to the kernel, e.g. kdbus. I know this'll sound paranoid, but how
> long before he pushes a patch that requires systemd to run the linux
> kernel?
Then you can take the very last commit to Linus' Git repository before
that hypothetical change, and fork the Linux kernel into whatever
direction your crazy heart desires.
Business as usual in the Free Software world.
Regards.
--
Canek Peláez Valdés
Profesor de asignatura, Facultad de Ciencias
Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-11-11 5:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-09-25 15:25 [gentoo-user] udev (viable) alternatives ? James
2014-09-25 17:47 ` Dale
2014-09-25 18:17 ` Samuli Suominen
2014-09-25 19:03 ` [gentoo-user] " James
2014-09-25 19:32 ` Dale
2014-09-26 0:23 ` Walter Dnes
2014-09-26 3:27 ` Alan McKinnon
2014-09-26 8:07 ` Neil Bothwick
2014-09-26 8:22 ` Canek Peláez Valdés
2014-09-26 8:46 ` Neil Bothwick
2014-09-26 8:47 ` Samuli Suominen
2014-09-26 9:04 ` Samuli Suominen
2014-09-26 16:47 ` David W Noon
2014-09-27 2:06 ` Samuli Suominen
2014-09-26 5:04 ` Samuli Suominen
2014-11-10 11:04 ` Tanstaafl
2014-11-10 12:30 ` Rich Freeman
2014-11-10 13:23 ` Tanstaafl
2014-11-10 14:23 ` Rich Freeman
2014-11-10 15:48 ` Samuli Suominen
2014-11-10 16:01 ` Tanstaafl
2014-11-11 5:20 ` Walter Dnes
2014-11-11 5:33 ` Samuli Suominen
2014-11-11 5:35 ` Canek Peláez Valdés [this message]
2014-11-11 12:18 ` Rich Freeman
2014-11-13 17:08 ` Walter Dnes
2014-11-17 10:27 ` Tom H
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CADPrc82ckZMq9t3FprfBGThWBdF31PHbNoxyVq3t-w2nAwc9WA@mail.gmail.com \
--to=caneko@gmail.com \
--cc=gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox