From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A3E31381F3 for ; Sun, 28 Jul 2013 16:17:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 09081E09A7; Sun, 28 Jul 2013 16:16:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-lb0-f172.google.com (mail-lb0-f172.google.com [209.85.217.172]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C8AC8E0946 for ; Sun, 28 Jul 2013 16:16:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-lb0-f172.google.com with SMTP id o7so1740630lbv.3 for ; Sun, 28 Jul 2013 09:16:56 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=xAr92ef2cAMy/TvpLN+D3iPulR+vwrtlsZzr/NSsjc4=; b=UyOh+C3JWE1A6Nr/jCsCmrhuspMgYKEfPQLW9c9wAJQnxrpqIzzpCBLsdJfJ+R57HT z0WqjlDdZVtShQWnasDZxR6+Ox/4gW2IRt1fhyU53mHrF/aON+aLPtrU0o3hp8HIH4qP flzRAa6WKAL2UfFldEMvUH06h6bGVPM79iBoB4GsqKAtREVsrGHt7IMwZZMD82g5cnFt 8EJrceOVGmSGL1AbifFP4NBu1BTQS+d18oxYlyV725iz27lp+8hxkWI9SDAPsTOtJ+R+ K9ATfkCrQF0+QFyonpDTiW6r7DVYqA0fKojjCQFAurV2MJBZYgWPSWiIc9SXzs2JgWgp l0qw== Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.112.60.234 with SMTP id k10mr23617321lbr.30.1375028216083; Sun, 28 Jul 2013 09:16:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.114.96.2 with HTTP; Sun, 28 Jul 2013 09:16:55 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <51F51B66.7040004@hadt.biz> References: <51F45029.8030903@gmail.com> <51F4D14A.4000309@xunil.at> <51F51B66.7040004@hadt.biz> Date: Sun, 28 Jul 2013 11:16:55 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: [~amd64] Some possibly (?) helpful hints re the big gnome-3.8 update From: =?UTF-8?B?Q2FuZWsgUGVsw6FleiBWYWxkw6lz?= To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Archives-Salt: c22f6547-2a6b-4e72-b2d3-1e1203c96dd8 X-Archives-Hash: 1f4a8ca3fd2661b253334da2b8fc4d8f On Sun, Jul 28, 2013 at 8:23 AM, Michael Hampicke wrote: > Am 28.07.2013 10:07, schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger: >> Am 28.07.2013 10:04, schrieb Canek Pel=C3=A1ez Vald=C3=A9s: >> >>> The only "special" thing I'm doing is to mask >sys-apps/systemd-204, >>> since 205 introduced the new cgroups management code (with systemd as >>> the only writer of the cgroups hierarchy), and it seems to cause some >>> minor problems with logind. Other than that, it works withouth a >>> glitch: gnome-base/gnome-3.8.0, sys-apps/systemd-204, no consolekit at >>> all. >> >> Same here, yes. I run systemd-206 but I didn't notice an problem(s) yet. >> Maybe there are some and I don't get it ;-) >> > > I had one problem, but I am not sure, if it's related to systemd > 204, > the removal of consolekit, or gnome at all. > > But when logging into my gnome session, /usr/libexec/gvfsd-fuse can not > be started, because the permissions of /dev/fuse are rw------ root:root > > Other distros like ubuntu have a fuse group for that, which does not > exist on gentoo. So I assume the default permissions for /dev/fuse on > gentoo machines should be rw-rw-rw- root:root? My problem was that *sometimes* (not always) I was unable to unlock my session after suspending my laptop or desktop. Reverting back to systemd-204 solved it, so I'm assuming that's the problem, although I didn't really investigated the issue. Regards. --=20 Canek Pel=C3=A1ez Vald=C3=A9s Posgrado en Ciencia e Ingenier=C3=ADa de la Computaci=C3=B3n Universidad Nacional Aut=C3=B3noma de M=C3=A9xico