From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 869D3138950 for ; Sat, 9 Feb 2013 23:30:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6BE3E21C05F; Sat, 9 Feb 2013 23:30:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ie0-f182.google.com (mail-ie0-f182.google.com [209.85.223.182]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C5E8D21C00E for ; Sat, 9 Feb 2013 23:30:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ie0-f182.google.com with SMTP id k14so6418250iea.41 for ; Sat, 09 Feb 2013 15:30:33 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=qXDkmBlxHocVlTiFxFdcwni9S0BXgSErTqmG8DaquhE=; b=setLxtQ7+mVgi/vyTo5+7MnN83ki0suwjjBTfLMWyzh+oNqhtXomNWtHjqepDfUMSd 1feefjMOdfK2UlVIJbVQwzglKtCULnLjoEWOrDAEVd2yCbu0QF066bXs5f4fZK2ufQjv iCZD618eccQvP4fTCWEUmrMa/VVeENQY7nWDDFAw8rDeb9IufKt0VWhVh+8Hx3akB6Uu BIzxe+ijL0Xg4VW9cr5RB4A98+0f9BIDBGzSPReqqYgBYpcYwk7RmMKhicZPuNIt2Fc/ D82wC27NzdGsjj2TcZrWVeTjcRvcGD2bb5IEBBGbQ/cMZYevdY2tM35iFZMmU1f2FLUO D8eA== Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.50.157.163 with SMTP id wn3mr8470879igb.89.1360452633078; Sat, 09 Feb 2013 15:30:33 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.64.25.111 with HTTP; Sat, 9 Feb 2013 15:30:32 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <5116A71D.90508@xunil.at> References: <5109521C.3030207@xunil.at> <510962CF.7000107@xunil.at> <51096750.6010002@xunil.at> <51096BA0.6060809@xunil.at> <510972F6.7040306@xunil.at> <51098123.2010507@xunil.at> <510AB530.6060401@xunil.at> <510AB985.7080708@xunil.at> <510C0B54.5050601@xunil.at> <510CE60E.2090501@xunil.at> <51124554.701@xunil.at> <51127D10.1030801@xunil.at> <511298FE.5080800@xunil.at> <51169BF4.2000801@xunil.at> <5116A71D.90508@xunil.at> Date: Sat, 9 Feb 2013 17:30:32 -0600 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] systemd-197-r1 starts gdm-3.6.2 From: =?UTF-8?B?Q2FuZWsgUGVsw6FleiBWYWxkw6lz?= To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Archives-Salt: 8b4c7567-6ab6-4b19-bb13-e3cb156cbc77 X-Archives-Hash: 507d2747cd5b4b0ebb53cf7c1fc2da37 On Sat, Feb 9, 2013 at 1:44 PM, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote= : > Am 2013-02-09 19:56, schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger: > >> AFAI understand these 2 lines should be enough to let systemd generate >> its relevant unit-files etc. >> >> Right? > > Additional thoughts: > > Is pam_mount obsolete with systemd? I don't know if "obsolete" is the correct definition, but it is not installed in any of my systems. > It is possible to mount my /home via systemd-unit as well ... the > difference seems to be that systemd would (try to) mount it at boot-time > while with pam_mount it would be mounted at login. You can mount almost all partitions with system units; there was a discussion some days ago about getting rid of /etc/fstab for the embedded case and stuff like that. Also, you can set the .mount unit for your $HOME, and make the gdm service depend on it (it would be mounted at gdm startup, not at session startup, though). > Thoughts? Experiences? I have never used pam_mount; what's the upside? Just delaying the mounting (and perhaps fsck'ing) of the partition until session login? Regards. --=20 Canek Pel=C3=A1ez Vald=C3=A9s Posgrado en Ciencia e Ingenier=C3=ADa de la Computaci=C3=B3n Universidad Nacional Aut=C3=B3noma de M=C3=A9xico