From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (unknown [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CBAE8138334 for ; Fri, 25 Jan 2019 19:41:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1AF42E116A; Fri, 25 Jan 2019 19:40:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-vk1-xa44.google.com (mail-vk1-xa44.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::a44]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9C6CBE111F for ; Fri, 25 Jan 2019 19:40:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-vk1-xa44.google.com with SMTP id t127so2388057vke.8 for ; Fri, 25 Jan 2019 11:40:45 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=zoKcHYmhguLGciu6SgkCx6hZ2HjELOvSaoaRI8xAidM=; b=tcPgJ7WPikSOuE4nDEH/hDMGHIgn1VOGEYIOESiM/zsCD868M0xGCFTQjuRQmwiS3y P7mxgzctAurO7a/Uw4bMFbtfvtN+1NOcDTRl6A3Rr9gMLuIBTdqVZ13fndA6tYnqec1G uUZUE9RWzpH3DIaXGePntBpV0OlX6WRrac2vpD/cU05LGJeZngVuguy1oORFJQ/TdASN RBTK+segd7XwRTDCftPb0bHjqlBp/dSdYG3kwIJhDZqUYugeu/AbU5YJbAFJyTgzruV4 pcP1WI4LZy6WkYqSND+k0l+MuP6WJWCZZVK3RlynjFd1kK15QlVuAADxFk4GM57/NGUo YUBQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=zoKcHYmhguLGciu6SgkCx6hZ2HjELOvSaoaRI8xAidM=; b=Y1OAwmN7fLBOFqotVAW80UMBonH+iceH31VyIiOgfsBp6IzFn0/M4V8pTEwz9EvDQ+ 5py/SAGJEooX0Q5Y9b3609hVpJBQ9qg0bt8CXxDMRG4JHOklXtY1JyLCE9xIgYq0F6gU 8L0a/Ne6sLV929IodaT0qFiL+OK8g9SpKmupvtFb+hRleHizVUarcVhds2/HCNJzWLPV c3nACVxE9eD6swXRPbqVtzge4g2zDAPiJ8vp6s45dHfuqO03D0apqEkFijg24u71HU7D 2ejc9Jnc6aVBWP/U6XB4eiYWK0Pchz9LqCquWf7hQoGGk/KZuTDbX3YrnPcaaZOjQ/I2 aZkw== X-Gm-Message-State: AJcUukev4hXZI8BgkND9ejnfWbdGJ0QHUzEnRko5JZoW3yIT4qR48vfZ 4R6AAhqkMCdq4ZgqNe1FYbOjF1COF6MdEYvvSyGl8xV9 X-Google-Smtp-Source: ALg8bN5PiIRnehRC1uwSehAfrjSyKpTOLnzb1qSNKG4PHRb5CDtagofdVqMEYpTsJzTbks/BfllevdnpU/fcfDC/KtM= X-Received: by 2002:a1f:2d89:: with SMTP id t131mr4765991vkt.27.1548445244113; Fri, 25 Jan 2019 11:40:44 -0800 (PST) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org X-Auto-Response-Suppress: DR, RN, NRN, OOF, AutoReply MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: =?UTF-8?B?Q2FuZWsgUGVsw6FleiBWYWxkw6lz?= Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2019 13:40:32 -0600 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Experiences with Flatpak? To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000bac81e05804d80a5" X-Archives-Salt: 91c98430-dd06-45a6-808c-c216895cae04 X-Archives-Hash: 5da259d01ae17bb352813c3ff41c2247 --000000000000bac81e05804d80a5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Jan 25, 2019 at 1:17 PM Nikos Chantziaras wrote: > On 25/01/2019 20:48, Grant Edwards wrote: > > But, flatpak isn't in the standard portage tree, so you have to use an > > overlay or local repo. > > > > This is beginning to look like a lot of work. > > > > Is it practical to use flatpak apps on Gentoo? > > I was using it for a while. Not anymore. > > It does exactly what it says on the box. However, GUI applications > installed in flatpak will completely ignore your desktop settings. > flatpak comes with its own gtk/qt/gnome/kde libraries and its own > completely separate settings for the desktop environment. > > This is why I'm not using it anymore. GUI apps look like ass. > That's weird; they look fine for me [1,2]. As yo say, they have different configurations (every application runs in an individual container), but the both look normal. Regards. [1] https://aztlan.fciencias.unam.mx/~canek/inkscape-gentoo.jpg [2] https://aztlan.fciencias.unam.mx/~canek/inkscape-flatpak.jpg --=20 Dr. Canek Pel=C3=A1ez Vald=C3=A9s Profesor de Carrera Asociado C Departamento de Matem=C3=A1ticas Facultad de Ciencias Universidad Nacional Aut=C3=B3noma de M=C3=A9xico --000000000000bac81e05804d80a5 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Fri,= Jan 25, 2019 at 1:17 PM Nikos Chantziaras <realnc@gmail.com> wrote:
On 25/01/2019 20:48, Gra= nt Edwards wrote:
> But, flatpak isn't in the standard portage tree, so you have to us= e an
> overlay or local repo.
>
> This is beginning to look like a lot of work.
>
> Is it practical to use flatpak apps on Gentoo?

I was using it for a while. Not anymore.

It does exactly what it says on the box. However, GUI applications
installed in flatpak will completely ignore your desktop settings.
flatpak comes with its own gtk/qt/gnome/kde libraries and its own
completely separate settings for the desktop environment.

This is why I'm not using it anymore. GUI apps look like ass.

That's weird; they look fine for me [1,2]. A= s yo say, they have different configurations (every application runs in an = individual container), but the both look normal.

R= egards.

--
Dr. Canek Pel=C3=A1ez Vald=C3=A9s
P= rofesor de Carrera Asociado C
Departamento de Matem=C3=A1ticas
Facult= ad de Ciencias
Universidad Nacional Aut=C3=B3noma de M=C3=A9xico<= /div>
--000000000000bac81e05804d80a5--