From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93B8D1388F0 for ; Thu, 7 Feb 2013 21:38:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 82EAB21C02F; Thu, 7 Feb 2013 21:38:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ia0-f172.google.com (mail-ia0-f172.google.com [209.85.210.172]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B3F4821C029 for ; Thu, 7 Feb 2013 21:38:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ia0-f172.google.com with SMTP id u8so3471401iag.3 for ; Thu, 07 Feb 2013 13:38:08 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=e99ymt4VlulLq8eI72i73rptp2lPKfBCyIlpaGR7vTU=; b=g/j3jX3b4GToQsOIWnCjo4eJDTBgTKh8D8N60FkCWXFKfhRqnZ9/rNobrR2MZ9vJdD oWro19cAjIZIGOjbn3aSmTXmlCdWRhQy7UrjKqrPtWvvfZosv67p0uSYIxG+axX9qEmB ITMvxdxgalBKo8JcJgpYYoiAvscwlR8C0l1XT/HIwi19nM7LsyFWGIOpajfjqho3+MsK BsRmjruaY2LJnamDYesindeSaZAlaLTNN8qkKJb6srBNG5TK/j399TrASUezvexBDRph 6p2TFXHrgGbswm/VLlSBhj/ZdR66BV7WRbjcFHdn5R4MDVFez9zWI165RBpv5StqLkPz X55Q== Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.42.121.14 with SMTP id h14mr5190264icr.27.1360273088921; Thu, 07 Feb 2013 13:38:08 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.64.25.111 with HTTP; Thu, 7 Feb 2013 13:38:08 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <20130203185145.4008d87f@weird.wonkology.org> <5113E717.7020402@libertytrek.org> <201302071753.56717.peter@humphrey.ukfsn.org> <51141466.3030109@libertytrek.org> Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2013 15:38:08 -0600 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] udev-191 bit me. Insufficient ptys From: =?UTF-8?B?Q2FuZWsgUGVsw6FleiBWYWxkw6lz?= To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Archives-Salt: 3de92346-7f63-4308-a5c5-d4317df81f34 X-Archives-Hash: 445d6c1cee84ae2379691516a5dca35b On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 3:25 PM, Paul Hartman wrote: > On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 2:53 PM, Tanstaafl wro= te: >> On 2013-02-07 12:53 PM, Peter Humphrey wrote: >>> >>> On Thursday 07 February 2013 17:40:39 Tanstaafl wrote: >>> >>>> So, since I have: >>>>> >>>>> shm /dev/shm tmpfs nodev,nosuid,noexec 0 0 >>>> >>>> >>>> I change the type tmpfs to devtmpfs... ok... >>> >>> >>> I think that's a mistake (because I did it too!) - you only need to cha= nge >>> the tile type of a /dev line, not /dev/shm. >> >> >> Oh... well, glad I asked... >> >> Can anyone (a dev maybe) please confirm this? >> >> I think that a lot of people will misread that like I (we) did... > > I believe he is correct and /dev/shm is irrelevant for this discussion. > > The important thing to note is that entries for precisely /dev and > /proc don't need to be in fstab at all for most people if they are > using the standard gentoo openrc/udev combination. I have 3 gentoo > systems running latest ~amd64 openrc and udev and none have /dev or > /proc in fstab and all boot up just fine for me. Obviously if you are > experimenting with other init system or udev alternatives then YMMV > but those people are probably smart enough to figure it out for > themselves already. :) For what is worth, you also don't need to specify neither /dev nor /proc in fstab with systemd. I'm not sure the init system has anything to do with it, though; I believe is udev work, so with a recent version of udev, no matter the init system (I think), /dev and /proc are unnecessary (and perhaps even problematic) in /etc/fstab. Regards. --=20 Canek Pel=C3=A1ez Vald=C3=A9s Posgrado en Ciencia e Ingenier=C3=ADa de la Computaci=C3=B3n Universidad Nacional Aut=C3=B3noma de M=C3=A9xico