From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org)
	by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <gentoo-user+bounces-127278-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
	id 1Qvv7g-00027q-0b
	for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 23 Aug 2011 17:50:48 +0000
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2126D21C151;
	Tue, 23 Aug 2011 17:50:39 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-ww0-f53.google.com (mail-ww0-f53.google.com [74.125.82.53])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 462C221C151
	for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Tue, 23 Aug 2011 17:49:32 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by wwf25 with SMTP id 25so366725wwf.10
        for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Tue, 23 Aug 2011 10:49:31 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        bh=K0rYe3HvAZY6JZWy1L+GK07Yj7q+yzt2OgrSwmCsje0=;
        b=mMBOsZT4GRMR5d3eYLJ23eBw9NSb3CrsgmIQeA8sXezwO8T0oG0XIDhUYuqTM9raPy
         q9LeuQX0tQRfSsd5WzYSVJUZUqBTbwcs3t21KmZqhBu11HdHhwaCAh4wZbBrDCMTLfW/
         nYbnF5qkaZty3ok2hE7FVrhnwBpIJRO0kHXY4=
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.216.24.30 with SMTP id w30mr932985wew.68.1314121771410; Tue,
 23 Aug 2011 10:49:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.216.30.193 with HTTP; Tue, 23 Aug 2011 10:49:31 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <0D8B951A-06D1-43B8-BD6D-46E7CB059746@stellar.eclipse.co.uk>
References: <4E4C2CC4.6080604@xunil.at>
	<4E529FF7.2050704@xunil.at>
	<4E52C56E.3090808@xunil.at>
	<2269917.TBy71Gn5NP@eve>
	<0D8B951A-06D1-43B8-BD6D-46E7CB059746@stellar.eclipse.co.uk>
Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2011 13:49:31 -0400
Message-ID: <CADPrc80QTn2Y-MNRCy0oPLiQHdBk3RAYKrO5DbVXQersK81Csg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] systemd
From: =?UTF-8?B?Q2FuZWsgUGVsw6FleiBWYWxkw6lz?= <caneko@gmail.com>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Archives-Salt: 
X-Archives-Hash: 177bd0d1423a5d1585f85a38fe05a36d

On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 1:17 PM, Stroller
<stroller@stellar.eclipse.co.uk> wrote:
>
> On 23 August 2011, at 07:27, Joost Roeleveld wrote:
>> ...
>>> * found this blog-entry against systemd:
>>>
>>> http://monolight.cc/2011/05/the-systemd-fallacy/
>>>
>>> I agree, it might be more useful on desktops ... so far I am still
>>> exploring and learning to get to the point to make a decision where and
>>> if to use.
>>
>> I think it is more useful on desktops and laptops, which get rebooted
>> regularly. On a server that tends to run for months without a reboot, a =
fast
>> init-system is important.
>>
>> And I don't really see the point of D-BUS on a server either. All the se=
rvices
>> that need to talk to each other already have working communication paths=
.
>
> Reading that blog entry I found discouraging the idea that dbus might be =
required on my servers in the future, if systemd becomes popular with distr=
os.

I don't see the problem with D-Bus. It's small (the only hard
dependency it has is an XML parser), and it provides the Linux/UNIX
(de facto) standard interprocess communication system.

Regards.
--=20
Canek Pel=C3=A1ez Vald=C3=A9s
Posgrado en Ciencia e Ingenier=C3=ADa de la Computaci=C3=B3n
Universidad Nacional Aut=C3=B3noma de M=C3=A9xico