From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1RGg4r-0003jd-Go for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 20 Oct 2011 00:01:42 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id BA91E21C08D; Thu, 20 Oct 2011 00:01:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wy0-f181.google.com (mail-wy0-f181.google.com [74.125.82.181]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B919B21C035 for ; Thu, 20 Oct 2011 00:00:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wyh5 with SMTP id 5so2759538wyh.40 for ; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 17:00:25 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=B/MVSCOtbbrQFPnJQdUlGJnn1NrhBQbIG/xQiq9sGeU=; b=DjkqxISsXl+eXc1m5qA5e81eQUqzTGKK8lL64+jEMrmrrUHSlrDH6PVlK4lED35eOj 4Uyoo6xgSBvb8BIMmwVsb2ZWT4sxr9DzhTwBuq714PkAJeKkugd2cQT5gbS/bVy+g/i1 EMvROLOW2kJjDPP4VDpgE3EUhpO1lpX87Xaf4= Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.138.209 with SMTP id a59mr1308859wej.94.1319068824850; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 17:00:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.234.130 with HTTP; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 17:00:24 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1319057561.485731.1.camel@localhost.localdomain> References: <4E9E98AF.5000401@nileshgr.com> <1319057561.485731.1.camel@localhost.localdomain> Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2011 17:00:24 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Networkmanager-9999 won't compile From: =?UTF-8?B?Q2FuZWsgUGVsw6FleiBWYWxkw6lz?= To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Archives-Salt: X-Archives-Hash: e3e86440b0af825fb86d624e0788aef5 On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 1:52 PM, Albert W. Hopkins wrote: > On Wed, 2011-10-19 at 13:11 -0700, Canek Pel=C3=A1ez Vald=C3=A9s wrote: >> Why don't you try networkmanager-0.9.1.90? It's working great for me >> in GNOME 3.2.0 >> >> Is there something in the live ebuild that you need? >> > I can't confirm (never tried it) but I've been told the autounmask > option in portage will "blindly" unmask even live ebuilds.. which might > account for people suddenly pulling in a surprising (and potentially > problematic) amount of live ebuilds. I haven't tried the autounmask option from portage, neither. The GNOME overlay offers a series of files you can link to your /etc/portage/package.{unmask,keywords,use,use.mask} directories: They are located in ${OVERLAYDIR}/status/portage-configs/ I haven't used those either, though. I prefer to unmask/keyword packages myself. What I do know is that using live ebuilds is basically flipping a coin; sometimes will work great, sometimes it will not even compile. Right now the only live ebuilds I'm using are: gnome-extra/libgda-9999 media-sound/rhythmbox-9999 sys-apps/gnome-disk-utility-9999 gnome-extra/gnome-shell-extensions-weather-9999 gnome-extra/gnome-shell-extensions-system-monitor-9999 Everything else works with the latest non-live ebuilds. Regards. --=20 Canek Pel=C3=A1ez Vald=C3=A9s Posgrado en Ciencia e Ingenier=C3=ADa de la Computaci=C3=B3n Universidad Nacional Aut=C3=B3noma de M=C3=A9xico