From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-user+bounces-144121-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
	by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93927138261
	for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Wed,  2 Jan 2013 22:05:29 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 67E57E0684;
	Wed,  2 Jan 2013 22:05:14 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-ie0-f182.google.com (mail-ie0-f182.google.com [209.85.223.182])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48BF0E05EF
	for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Wed,  2 Jan 2013 22:04:07 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-ie0-f182.google.com with SMTP id s9so17572589iec.27
        for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Wed, 02 Jan 2013 14:04:06 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        bh=PYO2V8mSW0BuJsHfxevo1v5QRMJCj6GuMMufXSEaVHk=;
        b=clNSkbJAFctx3+ywHrtAty+Q6YVkdBclDDRUmBw3GTv0Atl5orBs+AUeWyn8VHU0RQ
         NNJRx5j4pHT2svUtuhzfi5W61i/ZG/EFotCWBF/wYR1VZiAK77kewh+1PyjZLyiZ+cDL
         KN8aJLL8eK5FRgRZm06nYs+fWn2LxHr2Y1Ht9kZpgrCSGcMgYdSN95cCkoPQFLR6HRmK
         fiteQBNryKpM5qvEvPuvQs08srN+hrULNlzhyGoN+NvxxyOCYEVoxW1AGOwimr4xMy5G
         V4ZLSRDJCyjwFe8+wgy52MTtOiZ4ANMiln1CX26K7yVj8rOzApdJYsc/nfwiVohjVgCO
         enIw==
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.50.33.138 with SMTP id r10mr40709150igi.6.1357164246550; Wed,
 02 Jan 2013 14:04:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.64.32.195 with HTTP; Wed, 2 Jan 2013 14:04:06 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <loom.20130102T214951-919@post.gmane.org>
References: <loom.20130102T002638-817@post.gmane.org>
	<CAK2H+efgyNmj_nPQ=XNmw9F6_tEMnabEhCDUWsoEJDMd75qwqw@mail.gmail.com>
	<loom.20130102T214951-919@post.gmane.org>
Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2013 16:04:06 -0600
Message-ID: <CADPrc80Ah0J-PjooTiGCSkRtscev8iMQaf+zBCjbfeoRugw_Ug@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Ethernet Machination
From: =?UTF-8?B?Q2FuZWsgUGVsw6FleiBWYWxkw6lz?= <caneko@gmail.com>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Archives-Salt: a9310780-0304-49a3-88c8-95769fd9acb5
X-Archives-Hash: 40e84efe8ac9f4dcc702d6a74c53df67

On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 2:57 PM, james <wireless@tampabay.rr.com> wrote:
> Mark Knecht <markknecht <at> gmail.com> writes:
>
>
>> > So now that only one ethernet shows up, how do I prevent
>> > udev from renaming eth0 to eth3?
>
>> Probably remove any net-persistent rules that are hanging around. That
>> should free up udev to do more of what you suspect.
>
> Yep,
> I did this to see if udev would build the new rules..
>
>> mark <at> c2stable ~ $ ls -al /etc/udev/rules.d/
>> total 24
>> drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 Jan  1 14:40 .
>> drwxr-xr-x 3 root root 4096 Nov 26 17:33 ..
>> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root    0 Nov 26 17:31 .keep_sys-fs_udev-0
>> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root   79 Sep 26 06:19 51-android.rules
>> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root  166 Nov  3  2011 60-ipod.rules
>> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1196 May  5  2012 70-persistent-cd.rules
>> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root  627 Nov 26 17:33 70-persistent-net.rules
>
> Well is all works automatically, but udev did not create the
> files I thought it would upon reboot:
>
>
> rules.d # ls -alg
> total 12
> drwxr-xr-x 2 root  192 Jan  2 14:37 .
> drwxr-xr-x 4 root  152 Dec  9 23:26 ..
> -rw-r--r-- 1 root 1896 Sep 30 08:13 70-persistent-cd.rules
> -rw-r--r-- 1 root 2652 Aug 20  2010 70-persistent-cd.rules.old
> -rw-r--r-- 1 root  948 Dec  3 03:52 70-persistent-net.rules.31dec2012.old
>
> After deleting the 70-persistent-net.rule file
>
> udev does not re-create it. All is now fine with rc-status
> only showing net.eth0 which is set up how I like it
> per /etc/conf.d/net. All services are fine
>
>
> Move on, or hand edit the '70-persistent-net.rules' file?

I would move on. The idea is that everything "just works".

Regards.
--=20
Canek Pel=C3=A1ez Vald=C3=A9s
Posgrado en Ciencia e Ingenier=C3=ADa de la Computaci=C3=B3n
Universidad Nacional Aut=C3=B3noma de M=C3=A9xico