From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E32981381F4 for ; Mon, 13 Aug 2012 13:57:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0F7D9E07B9; Mon, 13 Aug 2012 13:57:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-gh0-f181.google.com (mail-gh0-f181.google.com [209.85.160.181]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40F41E0652 for ; Mon, 13 Aug 2012 13:54:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ghz3 with SMTP id 3so3283280ghz.40 for ; Mon, 13 Aug 2012 06:54:59 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=t7GJkfZtIOLJ/kRcEs94ZAGfYjINeKmp8sXXWnOcdWw=; b=Io1uskNyXh0EN1PhiiV+47RLLEhU7S9aci19mYHEaNBB7y1P0o5zFSiP7VBAVJz40t F1JtfBqkC+O/0+KUaVO/zA+TuqAfhspqXt/vbmgN/R4LdTK/WyN7A9mnD8gTvfiNVNA0 jDBGrWpHtTfJsV80GOlzkUYXbp4rOwQIew6NK9dQVCy9hJBg+pZQ+4ML1zHfrjnF6ewX NioRZboCzyMKS1gIW5ndgkABAi3HYGCZnldsdfeqTAhE61iVNV5biqh+2+vgkYwBvGA5 6Oxyflb6AVxdwcCR8ac5vUdaD3nHEBmfhyETZ8GSHiho/CQpY2QoNsE1HjYme8R2FM6+ BKrQ== Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.50.179.3 with SMTP id dc3mr5611148igc.18.1344866075200; Mon, 13 Aug 2012 06:54:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.42.155.70 with HTTP; Mon, 13 Aug 2012 06:54:35 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <5028FF82.7020908@nileshgr.com> References: <5028FF82.7020908@nileshgr.com> Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2012 15:54:35 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Fast file system for cache directory with lot's of files From: Michael Hampicke To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f46d04479ed7aece7e04c72608c5 X-Archives-Salt: 6ed173be-50a7-4fdf-8c18-925a20c982a2 X-Archives-Hash: 55012fea8b6f72018b97ba54cba25915 --f46d04479ed7aece7e04c72608c5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 > > You should have a look at xfs. > > I used to use ext4 earlier, traversing through /usr/portage used to be > very slow. When I switched xfs, speed increased drastically. > > This might be kind of unrelated, but makes sense. I guess traversing through directories may be faster with XFS, but in my experience ext4 perfoms better than XFS in regard to operations (cp, rm) on small files. I read that there are some tuning options for XFS and small files, but never tried it. But if somone seconds XFS I will try it too. --f46d04479ed7aece7e04c72608c5 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
You should have a look at xfs.

I used to use ext4 earlier, traversing through /usr/portage used to be very= slow. When I switched xfs, speed increased drastically.

This might be kind of unrelated, but makes sense.

I guess=A0traversing=A0through directories may be faster with XFS, b= ut in my experience ext4 perfoms better than XFS in regard to operations (c= p, rm) on small files.
I read that there are some tuning options for XFS and small files, but= never tried it.

But if somone seconds XFS I will = try it too.
--f46d04479ed7aece7e04c72608c5--