From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1SNQIb-0007m6-Hn for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 26 Apr 2012 15:08:01 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id ED457E045E; Thu, 26 Apr 2012 15:07:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-bk0-f53.google.com (mail-bk0-f53.google.com [209.85.214.53]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C78BFE07B9 for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2012 15:05:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: by bkcjk13 with SMTP id jk13so768012bkc.40 for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2012 08:05:15 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; bh=4DYjg74ase1yurw+M79VdEFjsCIYwgom157MQApboj4=; b=AP1t50Bst1H5qfu86qrIU4eT75sMtsAJocRpra9va4ePAwUovPoEmj/pblKtz/pSNq anZxq0ERwRWknMcy8X0TffSD4hlPdlgPOkvFWTON8uGv8/lem9fCqb/aH3dEe5Ilhnir phnaMPb7mRP9cw5vL+71wiiwj/6QsEX5rqDKuKFqB90MdV/2W5FOjWNoJ4U5SQPemdRo 5ddilETQBdLlIU5hZN4rWwL4e1mDylGd8p2PhRvRoSC2B+Jog4bK1C1IT/jYpmWZ+BSL xax7AeXXhiD9eXEBQ86Wy5KhecQFsGJkqyDs791M1XwNBFzO1FDf8vaYdlQBtOLF+A4u NU1g== Received: by 10.204.148.82 with SMTP id o18mr2491678bkv.108.1335452714776; Thu, 26 Apr 2012 08:05:14 -0700 (PDT) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.225.69 with HTTP; Thu, 26 Apr 2012 08:04:54 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Qian Qiao Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2012 23:04:54 +0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Just a heads-up, I think =sys-libs/glibc-2.14.1-r3 is a stinker. To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Archives-Salt: e501600a-b72f-4c7b-a357-a072e16f5b89 X-Archives-Hash: 4fe5c90f95eac2a8ba54d7c01121ec8d On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 22:41, Michael Mol wrote: > On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 10:34 AM, Qian Qiao wrote: >> On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 19:40, Michael Mol wrote: >>> >>> MAKEOPTS="-j1" didn't fix it. Off to find another solution. >>> -- >>> :wq >>> >> >> Does sound like it's just you. I've been running with MAKEOPTS="-j13" >> and everything compiled and ran just fine. > > Checking to see if it's a distcc problem, now. If it is, it'll only be > the third time I've ever had issues from distcc, and the first time a > distcc issue resulted in a successful build of a package that broke > things. I thought glibc doesn't use distcc even if you have it enabled. Correct me if I'm wrong though.