From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-user+bounces-171155-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
	by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49885138222
	for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Wed,  4 May 2016 22:53:10 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 88FC721C072;
	Wed,  4 May 2016 22:53:00 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-wm0-f48.google.com (mail-wm0-f48.google.com [74.125.82.48])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3B88621C057
	for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Wed,  4 May 2016 22:52:59 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-wm0-f48.google.com with SMTP id g17so436611wme.1
        for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Wed, 04 May 2016 15:52:59 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to;
        bh=GqJiJzYOdmGamLiubiBTAAbwKHZxYOzMZ6TSfn7yHx4=;
        b=v4leuABJETKWXo5d3qTpQgzUTosnMJDla3fq5LjyPofSdNNl46XrvG3mRzQ/ic+JIU
         9JvNqESqESZdcN34gtVcslkUZM0yrR5BXMtZDBiBZso5W5jHIzwDkzF7mc+MXxtArymS
         5IrcaO7xQf8T19GYN7lXlyS9oypohp2vC2cUelV9Fz7XaF6Q7amY3X9kIdjK/rc17veL
         OR4+T9G+kRSG2lo1MwGcBSq+KtgNPNnynuAoUiD74i0kxBffyqIarvoFoV0g2JSa3gQP
         jsmEINIrkVD9mNZh7Bx9As9Smobqhw25zw05PRJgRx9Idfvkc5TB9jfIQa8RJYnmLqGd
         gn8Q==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
        h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date
         :message-id:subject:to;
        bh=GqJiJzYOdmGamLiubiBTAAbwKHZxYOzMZ6TSfn7yHx4=;
        b=ljhHZwWkqKHCG+wK6aMbvRk9TyySlFlx7RCRukguThUQbPfWGQcx9MB2jXZu8rlwkx
         Rm4wiEcEPMfd59Sce/xm8pi4d4jBRHelHNXh4yCtqiWNd++etCt2GATCmUVodfx+DSXH
         aCsNsvd+7Z/InXCQ4k+FKB75kVmZbpeB0/IPHbxTevlpuDQMda2kf0/20S8prYVkcN/f
         z/EIrUOHmJ/Mac2PwDURU9HpwSqtklhBfUftcsbaeJIzfIMsylOuORRnyqur94BFki90
         2U9gxsI6z2OXQmzzWxmE45jTFD3Xp295qoNHcK7i8+Rasfwcg2e6+sNOhu73euEMdijO
         GHRg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOPr4FVIGrTwld73K1uQWf/6YQ7wfU6yjjfucMh80jLyYy5KHqbzpSp4sMd9QoVqnbM15UB0eCCrHGihjG7ApQ==
X-Received: by 10.194.189.231 with SMTP id gl7mr11585622wjc.129.1462402377988;
 Wed, 04 May 2016 15:52:57 -0700 (PDT)
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.28.232.204 with HTTP; Wed, 4 May 2016 15:52:38 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAKe5ZPy3ksELB_HwQruedszHXVqvELELAfrRc+KLqGQ_Qj02fg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAC_tCmp5yV_9B+A20O+sk6QNs=Ey=31GKehwn93HDv1-wgJPbw@mail.gmail.com>
 <3508588.A2Wzk4mQlR@serenity> <CAC_tCmpepu5HX95hq5n9VOErVpRknDtS6r==A9MKVEaMYYFrXQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAKe5ZPy3ksELB_HwQruedszHXVqvELELAfrRc+KLqGQ_Qj02fg@mail.gmail.com>
From: John Blinka <john.blinka@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 4 May 2016 18:52:38 -0400
Message-ID: <CAC_tCmqZcyVHw-ONXGf8ZZcZ4YW2VMV3Wr88W35j-91yfFOJkw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] CPU you selected does not support x86-64
 instruction set
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7bb046c042416705320c16f1
X-Archives-Salt: 4aeb15db-ff73-4242-af5d-322e89106723
X-Archives-Hash: 6aca56d203464599e92ffbcea3af897f

--047d7bb046c042416705320c16f1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

On Wed, May 4, 2016 at 12:36 PM, Ron Farrer <canutethegreat@gmail.com>
wrote:

>
> Generally, 'uname -m' should report x86_64 for 64-bit (amd64) and i686
> for 32-bit (x86).


uname -m did give x86_64, but...


> ... another check can be 'file /sbin/init' which will report as something
> along the lines of
> "/sbin/init: ELF 64-bit LSB executable, x86-64, version 1 (SYSV),
> dynamically linked, interpreter /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2, for
> GNU/Linux 2.6.32, stripped"
>

file /sbin/init gave ELF 32-bit LSB...

So I guess my syrescuecd is 32 bits.

Using the amd64 handbook did the trick with the kernel.  Now onto learning
about uefi.  Thanks for your help!

John

--047d7bb046c042416705320c16f1
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div dir=3D"ltr"><br><div class=3D"gmail_extra"><br><div class=3D"gmail_quo=
te">On Wed, May 4, 2016 at 12:36 PM, Ron Farrer <span dir=3D"ltr">&lt;<a hr=
ef=3D"mailto:canutethegreat@gmail.com" target=3D"_blank">canutethegreat@gma=
il.com</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"=
margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><span class=
=3D"">
<br>
</span>Generally, &#39;uname -m&#39; should report x86_64 for 64-bit (amd64=
) and i686<br>
for 32-bit (x86).</blockquote><div><br></div><div>uname -m did give x86_64,=
 but...<br>=C2=A0<br></div><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margi=
n:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">... another check=
 can be &#39;file /sbin/init&#39; which will report as something along the =
lines of<br>
&quot;/sbin/init: ELF 64-bit LSB executable, x86-64, version 1 (SYSV),<br>
dynamically linked, interpreter /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2, for<br>
GNU/Linux 2.6.32, stripped&quot;<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>file /=
sbin/init gave ELF 32-bit LSB...<br><br></div><div>So I guess my syrescuecd=
 is 32 bits.<br><br></div><div>Using the amd64 handbook did the trick with =
the kernel.=C2=A0 Now onto learning about uefi.=C2=A0 Thanks for your help!=
<br><br></div><div>John<br></div></div><br></div></div>

--047d7bb046c042416705320c16f1--