From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5730E1382C5 for ; Mon, 19 Feb 2018 00:51:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D727BE09E8; Mon, 19 Feb 2018 00:50:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wr0-x242.google.com (mail-wr0-x242.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c0c::242]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 52B32E09B6 for ; Mon, 19 Feb 2018 00:50:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wr0-x242.google.com with SMTP id p104so6682603wrc.12 for ; Sun, 18 Feb 2018 16:50:51 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=554JaQTBC9uxqcq26rGBHN72ccgcGHFSXmlmv9+dAog=; b=QC53Y5oEJO2WW4Ftw/GTVHsrHKwE0Jf1ihIkMowpQm7ygUDOyFK/9EqT5iQROK8dlr 0BuZ1hzIFZbODP9CLah5pq22f8t3HNTcl1xpeqVqkNYuO0d3nUVyEL/nmkFkUUvGC6O6 pnMzUDuQS6qbY0YIjxCYZr/GqlAdybnCWFeghMawbWy4ARsuApWgD7I4Ca7UXdjZ7AUu GyhoUM9RuxOxtXz47tkBIgW/GWA//CI+f6bv2Y9PBkUI4qQFdF3AhGc760D6OXdC+8xt WMCX6FR7OpO3ZKymn3FWC04Tmwco6Jo/cTa9xDhZWhKqjLn5iNG52hndpEbmJxwLAaeE XGpA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=554JaQTBC9uxqcq26rGBHN72ccgcGHFSXmlmv9+dAog=; b=hmM/ge0nqXG04GezCc0yhVVlVWLxe8dEsSB5qi4/JSaddvX/mVgXWWkHxWL8JqJNn/ lbX2IE5rUU9tDdU3NElleihiriyhe1FcKJ8FuWyHIEQeXxc22DOc/a3ItmIPKyqXGbTH /32woxT7Bo5I0OZcktZFk/r13Nh+2nHZWIpf69T1soO2zUjzCYr3VX80Ktbmf/we/+Mw nHySAOOKIr+L8bHOaRG3Zt1/1hvPJjzblsHegu1wc3WrkzgEMhdYZqsi3Akzfk+Wq9zU QUAxWixcYzFtvknaJ6bKl2hz5+qeJYr2b5kZIVbeztcjEQKsOSMbtbUw4nmgFWNDljqM jEOA== X-Gm-Message-State: APf1xPDfpj/vKrfMdUH0251cVeW8YZJjfnlyxxDkx3pNKN7Nm8ECyVKM SlG4YFbOCPPFMLXtTL0IvHRaqGrgLacVmnBQFK0= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AH8x225uA1eYBmlVWe/lFUM137Ut9BTDmn3UyZo4mxVNIl4w+QiZgTEloJ8WPaL7gilcH8k8Ks6fFqh+qX5zP/214i4= X-Received: by 10.223.176.228 with SMTP id j33mr5141488wra.67.1519001449837; Sun, 18 Feb 2018 16:50:49 -0800 (PST) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <87371zt86n.fsf@nyu.edu> <4876333.DpMW1yWErG@dell_xps> <87371y71do.fsf@nyu.edu> In-Reply-To: <87371y71do.fsf@nyu.edu> From: John Blinka Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2018 00:50:38 +0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] webkit-gtk build failure and masking confusion To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a113c039ed4ba72056586153c" X-Archives-Salt: ebec73a8-b945-4f91-87e8-d953f61e5a02 X-Archives-Hash: dcf8faa746189e5cec8f4d133b8d1c66 --001a113c039ed4ba72056586153c Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Feb 18, 2018 at 10:40 AM allan gottlieb wrote: > On Sun, Feb 18 2018, Mick wrote: > > > On Sunday, 18 February 2018 01:09:36 GMT allan gottlieb wrote: > > Specifically excluding the buggy (old) version of webkit-gtk, > portage wants me to merge a newish (testing) version of gnucash that > uses a solid new version of webkit-gtk. I have the new version of > webkit-gtk, but really want to delay installing the testing gnucash. Looks like gnucash-2.7.4-r1 is now in the stable branch of portage despite gnucash declaring =E2=80=9CThis release is UNSTABLE and SHOULD NOT BE USED = in production=E2=80=9D (their caps, not mine). I=E2=80=99ve masked it and rev= erted to icu58.2-r1 by masking icu-60.2. The older icu allows webkit-gtk-2.4.11-r200 to build, and gives me a version of gnucash which I=E2=80=99ve used for a long time and trust. Not going to upgrade irrevers= ibly to a version which the authors themselves don=E2=80=99t trust. My 2 cents. John --001a113c039ed4ba72056586153c Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Sun, Feb 18, 2018 at 10= :40 AM allan gottlieb <gottlieb@nyu.= edu> wrote:
On Sun, Feb 18 2= 018, Mick wrote:

> On Sunday, 18 February 2018 01:09:36 GMT allan gottlieb wrote:

=C2=A0 =C2=A0 Specifically excluding the buggy (old) version of webkit-gtk,=
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 portage wants me to merge a newish (testing) version of gnuca= sh that
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 uses a solid new version of webkit-gtk.=C2=A0 I have the new = version of
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 webkit-gtk, but really want to delay installing the testing g= nucash.

Looks lik= e gnucash-2.7.4-r1 is now in the stable branch of portage despite gnucash d= eclaring =E2=80=9CThis release is UNSTABLE and SHOULD NOT BE USED in produc= tion=E2=80=9D (their caps, not mine).=C2=A0 I=E2=80=99ve masked it and reve= rted to icu58.2-r1 by masking icu-60.2.=C2=A0 The older icu allows webkit-g= tk-2.4.11-r200 to build, and gives me a version of gnucash which I=E2=80=99= ve used for a long time and trust.=C2=A0 Not going to upgrade irreversibly = to a version which the authors themselves don=E2=80=99t trust.=C2=A0 My 2 c= ents.

John
--001a113c039ed4ba72056586153c--