From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 558DF1382C5 for ; Sat, 17 Feb 2018 20:23:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8D979E09B0; Sat, 17 Feb 2018 20:23:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wr0-x229.google.com (mail-wr0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c0c::229]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 097F3E0826 for ; Sat, 17 Feb 2018 20:23:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wr0-x229.google.com with SMTP id s5so6016340wra.0 for ; Sat, 17 Feb 2018 12:23:35 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=4cuQGtYvIPGhDWYC4GMrpoNmueOaiAj+IdYgBr26d+0=; b=BoPOCvFhVgnUVtdnePQyulVU3D367SGCvX9jlcuzza5GN3Ku/j3Qx8g/VYP7TUtpK6 Epe/GQy8LzP/S5LUeqrpbnnK9TBsMnF4oWHMT044zAlizN3x2gkrZwWvPhL9Dha7NnxD coslbSwRyy8xopguZFVoOJ9aKLa4rY6jbZ8SIKMbhF2tGQNf4NjuYmVZVrf4I6vffbi+ y7nuwxbnTTlWQBA6REU8MyFVSdfZR/OTD1wi5b4dWaF5TSzkEe6HsnSJI6sTX2drWzWe wW+kKy1sszZBJgmQPE6m9NeYwZGV9MoFqKdbLs7wngUI0bAmTdXnXeziPDIGPMvvaCAh Q2hA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=4cuQGtYvIPGhDWYC4GMrpoNmueOaiAj+IdYgBr26d+0=; b=sgADcGuPjn2BIT9xsDTybh5ahcdzE7N+VKytr9Y5RZzOpv5JhAhUQxcOMnKfHG5OxA JjNBOtavaV/6/nSb4+ElF5GYbXafCcaQx4zN9cwv1h+uXpc177J6uiTj0slDqRKlCfeB i0PYge0vFY+u3r77/ha7JrwoHFFGPUZTVAVPPDgKxesV8GajsLRPwOXnk6npDSLg+k7W nk17KeRXig2FRCzuMF62xsglNyIGk10t7fGPNI8yeAnF2FYUCpiAcfkPoAf4EgfmXkJD NcT2lQM4zpdztQMKXU3t9iiGQGinfsL4IZk4XwNfNtbnv1UqmeZKfa9NXs4nFOg1gFBY fk0g== X-Gm-Message-State: APf1xPCQc9vvbjPsvnIaDkzOj/tr6W8LB0GwRbQyoXwJbRCI6tKjxHSl a+YdywXmjjxVUUF3v5w8uN1yw3BuH+1oicWC3vfkIQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AH8x225k4+EpXc8pZMxoRzrazqRxZoWU/pxJcuoRwZ1RCiQW5wBY7PIJ6iVBdVQKct13pva4szeEAIYPhmouX4MbyAc= X-Received: by 10.223.176.228 with SMTP id j33mr2796377wra.67.1518899014443; Sat, 17 Feb 2018 12:23:34 -0800 (PST) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.28.235.23 with HTTP; Sat, 17 Feb 2018 12:23:13 -0800 (PST) From: John Blinka Date: Sat, 17 Feb 2018 15:23:13 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: [gentoo-user] webkit-gtk build failure and masking confusion To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Archives-Salt: f4e72f59-fc07-4d02-86ac-7a5da64e47fb X-Archives-Hash: 68f76210e6b8dd49a8d1f5ed8e5d93f4 Hi, all, A recent update demanded that I rebuild webkit-gtk-2.4.11-r200. Unfortunately I cannot get this package to rebuild. In my experience, this particular version of webkit-gtk has always been a very fragile build. I've put way too much time into wrestling with it and I'd like to get rid of it. There's a newer version: webkit-gtk-2.18.6, which builds with no problems. The only package on my system that needs webkit-gtk is gnucash. All of the stable ebuilds for gnucash contain this line >=net-libs/webkit-gtk-1.2:2 And all of the versions of webkit-gtk in portage satisfy this condition. So, I ought to be able to use webkit-2.18.6, right? But, I cannot get portage to agree to use webkit-2.18.6. It insists that this package is masked.. And I cannot figure out how or why it is masked. Nothing masks it in /etc/portage. It's keyworded amd64, which is what I'm running. I have followed through all the mask/unmask files in my profile (default/linux/amd64/17.0/desktop (stable)) and have found webkit-gtk mentioned precisely twice: in /usr/portage/profiles/arch/base/package.use.mask and /usr/portage/profiles/arch/amd64/package.use.mask. The comments in these files suggest that the use flag "jit" is masked in general, but allowed in amd64. So there's nothing I know to look for that seems to prevent any available version of webkit-gtk from being considered. Yet if I mask off webkit-gtk-2.4.11-r200 in /etc/portage/package.mask and attempt to build gnucash, I get his error message: !!! All ebuilds that could satisfy ">=net-libs/webkit-gtk-1.2:2" have been masked. !!! One of the following masked packages is required to complete your request: - net-libs/webkit-gtk-2.4.11-r200::gentoo (masked by: package.mask) And that's on a system that contains webkit-gtk-2.18.6. Can anyone explain to me why portage won't use webkit-gtk-2.18.6 to satisfy gnucash's needs? Thanks, John Blinka