From: John Blinka <john.blinka@gmail.com>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: [gentoo-user] webkit-gtk build failure and masking confusion
Date: Sat, 17 Feb 2018 15:23:13 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAC_tCmqRv9_h5uoLDQ5seiBh_=Xy5W9BDtYeCRFHfXy1-6hEew@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
Hi, all,
A recent update demanded that I rebuild webkit-gtk-2.4.11-r200.
Unfortunately I cannot get this package to rebuild.
In my experience, this particular version of webkit-gtk has always
been a very fragile build. I've put way too much time into wrestling
with it and I'd like to get rid of it. There's a newer version:
webkit-gtk-2.18.6, which builds with no problems.
The only package on my system that needs webkit-gtk is gnucash. All
of the stable ebuilds for gnucash contain this line
>=net-libs/webkit-gtk-1.2:2
And all of the versions of webkit-gtk in portage satisfy this condition.
So, I ought to be able to use webkit-2.18.6, right? But, I cannot get
portage to agree to use webkit-2.18.6. It insists that this package
is masked.. And I cannot figure out how or why it is masked.
Nothing masks it in /etc/portage.
It's keyworded amd64, which is what I'm running.
I have followed through all the mask/unmask files in my profile
(default/linux/amd64/17.0/desktop (stable)) and have found webkit-gtk
mentioned precisely twice: in
/usr/portage/profiles/arch/base/package.use.mask and
/usr/portage/profiles/arch/amd64/package.use.mask. The comments in
these files suggest that the use flag "jit" is masked in general, but
allowed in amd64.
So there's nothing I know to look for that seems to prevent any
available version of webkit-gtk from being considered. Yet if I mask
off webkit-gtk-2.4.11-r200 in /etc/portage/package.mask and attempt to
build gnucash, I get his error message:
!!! All ebuilds that could satisfy ">=net-libs/webkit-gtk-1.2:2" have
been masked.
!!! One of the following masked packages is required to complete your request:
- net-libs/webkit-gtk-2.4.11-r200::gentoo (masked by: package.mask)
And that's on a system that contains webkit-gtk-2.18.6.
Can anyone explain to me why portage won't use webkit-gtk-2.18.6 to
satisfy gnucash's needs?
Thanks,
John Blinka
next reply other threads:[~2018-02-17 20:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-02-17 20:23 John Blinka [this message]
2018-02-17 20:38 ` [gentoo-user] webkit-gtk build failure and masking confusion Neil Bothwick
2018-02-17 23:20 ` John Blinka
2018-02-18 2:14 ` Neil Bothwick
2018-02-18 2:30 ` allan gottlieb
2018-02-18 4:07 ` Jack
2018-02-18 9:52 ` Neil Bothwick
2018-02-19 16:52 ` Peter Humphrey
2018-02-18 1:09 ` allan gottlieb
2018-02-18 8:51 ` Mick
2018-02-18 9:49 ` Neil Bothwick
2018-02-18 15:41 ` allan gottlieb
2018-02-18 15:39 ` allan gottlieb
2018-02-19 0:50 ` John Blinka
2018-02-19 1:42 ` allan gottlieb
2018-02-19 18:05 ` thelma
2018-02-19 18:59 ` Neil Bothwick
2018-02-19 19:40 ` allan gottlieb
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAC_tCmqRv9_h5uoLDQ5seiBh_=Xy5W9BDtYeCRFHfXy1-6hEew@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=john.blinka@gmail.com \
--cc=gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox