From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5225E138956 for ; Sun, 10 Feb 2013 02:24:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3C11521C028; Sun, 10 Feb 2013 02:24:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-oa0-f42.google.com (mail-oa0-f42.google.com [209.85.219.42]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 963E021C015 for ; Sun, 10 Feb 2013 02:24:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-oa0-f42.google.com with SMTP id i18so5303095oag.1 for ; Sat, 09 Feb 2013 18:24:36 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type; bh=TAw84WsWHgQ8gAGwOyVfRrw7Aeshr8qzVLEuKicFGRs=; b=o5EmUrcPl5kp5HD+qMqoEbTdxzEQBIXzfdYn3Jey3LEja6AK2S6r2e7AkeT9Qm+rrw O+Y0/cLbEBoN87mGNGALbYJ+CJdUlwd8UvXha4u/kOBDnmv986NQ0XNwGyq36pQG0Pce 0kEUPkE2hg7x1yHeh3kOvFfohUH+bm3oYKpzq5/683xZ67YMuIKPumqEbKh+Bw7Det6M Mv15h0x0tZDFhOoP54KMZDz+qprVX14HXt+s5ft0MAB3MS7fqREIbyZj+UL9heURIopX m6gEZv5Ixc4FuKoh2R0WjGq/dwGsJ0/Iy9zZuXS2/pMqZqAtK5aPN2jYEVIBMdWS/oCs mOEw== Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.60.3.10 with SMTP id 10mr7860606oey.61.1360463076656; Sat, 09 Feb 2013 18:24:36 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.60.16.135 with HTTP; Sat, 9 Feb 2013 18:24:36 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <51165452.10600@gmail.com> References: <5113DA25.7060408@gmail.com> <5115BB67.9010307@gmail.com> <51165452.10600@gmail.com> Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2013 13:24:36 +1100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] {OT} LWP::UserAgent slows website From: Adam Carter To: "gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org" Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=e89a8f83ae1b6a05d604d5557e30 X-Archives-Salt: 8941265c-be10-44d9-a183-14959036f50f X-Archives-Hash: 889cb6aebcb1fd64521452269914ac22 --e89a8f83ae1b6a05d604d5557e30 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sure, so long as Apache doesn't have any additional modules loaded. If > it's got something like mod_php loaded (extraordinarily common), > mod_perl or mod_python (less common, now) then the init time of > mod_php gets added to the init time for every request handler. > Interesting, so if you have to use mod_php you'd probably be better off running Worker than Prefork, and you'd want to keep MaxConnectionsPerChild on the higher side, to reduce init work you've mentioned, right? May also help to verify that KeepAlive is on and tweak MaxKeepAliveRequests a little higher. --e89a8f83ae1b6a05d604d5557e30 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Sure, so long as Apache doesn't have any additional mo= dules loaded. If
<= blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-l= eft:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"> it's got something like mod_php loaded (extraordinarily common),
mod_perl or mod_python (less common, now) then the init time of
mod_php gets added to the init time for every request handler.

Interesting, so if you have = to use mod_php you'd probably be better off running Worker than Prefork= , and you'd want to keep MaxConnectionsPerChild on the higher side, to = reduce init work you've mentioned, right? May also help to verify that = KeepAlive is on and tweak MaxKeepAliveRequests a little higher.
--e89a8f83ae1b6a05d604d5557e30--