From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0D4CC1382C5 for ; Tue, 1 Jun 2021 12:06:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D2ABAE086F; Tue, 1 Jun 2021 12:06:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-oi1-x236.google.com (mail-oi1-x236.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::236]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8C7B3E0858 for ; Tue, 1 Jun 2021 12:06:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-oi1-x236.google.com with SMTP id x15so15228871oic.13 for ; Tue, 01 Jun 2021 05:06:44 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=p2qCuN7Y+APhjNfifQIrrjDHvdNZSnpRaCQkJcCYcag=; b=YuyY0x4umrGbvXYvtf8nmy3+Rmvaxm2I8NTk0magcJjCoq8CUV2KUYjjI5Tbp5fF0j RXbYZ3UBwuCG8XzqM00K8U0mlnU5KwCTptjp8pmJ1nFcS37KNiHpvzJOxLk6coOI087c 06dyJOivdp+mVIkfXbLqAQLq4Xf78muwu6Iu+YdSHspeTU8g+nHJpTY+cOVNt9HYGzke j4WUi5Yx0LVAfv+FS0bpTfWb/o951ani9NwzYpt7LDi6bvQe/fWsk3tX8TxCo5+NCuTB nUCAN1j51NwDkmDbBQGHQOSl/moCoAmRUaJUfZo3BDFeLkqqUk/BQ5k9wvj8alSaOFwL mZJw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=p2qCuN7Y+APhjNfifQIrrjDHvdNZSnpRaCQkJcCYcag=; b=XPlLX9JvLL33B4PUmoGuYmrAruOrGSa+i79VpoyIGhEpf2NzzNv3ZBsYZnPy+Is2Nt 7HlXRalkxz+8bTzQJhI9MJiooNvz8nQaSeJLdfRkvG6tYSDL55bXO/2npEuiwXeq8zVZ NG24ihg3n9pxWBoE5w2tzyp6PjZVcgYbIOJuS9PC9IR6bS1OcAAPJh1l4v8PnyiLCDx5 wsjor0BwoE6HzkXJN2lZsT12MWZ/j/FgI2zeiw0maHmLJt+mGpCjtY+Nv7l1xwAS1bQ4 XfJKKMCze6aHj7UqAVlP4b+fUEWCFu4iLtXCGLw2oh5y99Lma+W/GQtSOeBwqPFYGMjf h7Pw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531M7DMsh0l8VWtE25ZFmRMvmiFDzZC78WxUCMdZMOTi7QUcU594 5w1ZHSjojsc/IPXjI//uLck9m+taTdHwLXfh3KrQfLD0 X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJx4+n9iKalZOldZJ0nUAzVQtj+LoT+NWfzPGdikBJBcWSr+53yn+ieu9Bn1Ei3OdN0/U4t2KDNd/ZK4HEZHrYo= X-Received: by 2002:a54:460a:: with SMTP id p10mr2977895oip.47.1622549203742; Tue, 01 Jun 2021 05:06:43 -0700 (PDT) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org X-Auto-Response-Suppress: DR, RN, NRN, OOF, AutoReply MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1eee5cf4-9234-07cf-4b83-7de431483d51@sys-concept.com> <2596776.mvXUDI8C0e@iris> In-Reply-To: <2596776.mvXUDI8C0e@iris> From: Adam Carter Date: Tue, 1 Jun 2021 22:06:32 +1000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] is "scp" reliable? To: Gentoo User Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000eb72fe05c3b32ccc" X-Archives-Salt: 8163a7e2-6b14-4696-a578-c1ccf5b1ab60 X-Archives-Hash: 45c146b0d53cae2a33ea2b566a2e6a5f --000000000000eb72fe05c3b32ccc Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" On Tue, Jun 1, 2021 at 2:46 PM J. Roeleveld wrote: > On Saturday, May 29, 2021 11:04:44 PM CEST Mark Knecht wrote: > > On Sat, May 29, 2021 at 1:33 PM wrote: > > > > > > > Another mystery. > > > I copied the file to USB 1TB sandisk. > > > md5sum check OK same as my computer > > > > > > > > > Different revisions of md5sum possibly? > > I have never had issues with different md5sum tools. > Yes - it hard to imagine a bug of that seriousness not being detected. Getting it right is the tool's raison d'etre. --000000000000eb72fe05c3b32ccc Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Tue, Jun 1, 2021 at 2:46 PM J. Roeleveld <joost@antarean.org> wrote:
On Saturday, May 29, 2021 11:04:44 PM C= EST Mark Knecht wrote:
> On Sat, May 29, 2021 at 1:33 PM <thelma@sys-concept.com> wrote:
> <SNIP>
>
> > Another mystery.
> > I copied the file to USB 1TB sandisk.
> > md5sum check OK same as my computer
> >
> >

> Different revisions of md5sum possibly?

I have never had issues with different md5sum tools.
<= br>
Yes - it hard to imagine a bug of that seriousness not being = detected. Getting it right is the tool's raison d'etre.
--000000000000eb72fe05c3b32ccc--