From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-user+bounces-150498-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
	by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7EF311381F3
	for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Mon,  9 Sep 2013 06:50:52 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C0E0DE0AA2;
	Mon,  9 Sep 2013 06:50:45 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-oa0-f47.google.com (mail-oa0-f47.google.com [209.85.219.47])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BFDFBE0A97
	for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Mon,  9 Sep 2013 06:50:44 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-oa0-f47.google.com with SMTP id g12so6086245oah.20
        for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Sun, 08 Sep 2013 23:50:44 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type;
        bh=ARR9C8/kzH9azsKYBJuf1tFU53ztZP9ZleFLfsh5xPc=;
        b=BWfVsCNkVM11WG5vLzON6kppUhjQr6KCW8KOlQ30+XG8/r3Tj5Ccz1OSObH1NqdL6m
         KVLR94z306DYV//crFQa+bDboUYfGlxqJ1ynGcCgLD9aFaDVLT+FVpDcsp+KnzbtiXax
         EihX01pQV2t5SrQet/LjnEqE9QETRh4dUOvLla+XbIEdtyTVFHiKd47b511ws9t3/qX7
         kHz8gFlDtjkJr5jrPWeXOlt9M/dbj9i4GHZViYmgfTsYhQYXpyPyF1bn5Em9TgYVREKr
         99twZV9yoCEC+gtQYgTYlenFYiNw2S/KtE9YOghY5yrTnB1cciICWDoQg5GVLTXlsRnv
         SYKw==
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.182.66.164 with SMTP id g4mr10061019obt.47.1378709443965;
 Sun, 08 Sep 2013 23:50:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.182.151.72 with HTTP; Sun, 8 Sep 2013 23:50:43 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <522D2D05.1000400@orlitzky.com>
References: <522D257C.5060902@gmail.com>
	<522D2D05.1000400@orlitzky.com>
Date: Mon, 9 Sep 2013 16:50:43 +1000
Message-ID: <CAC=wYCFWSja+uYL3oxX=jwhcYDq0O=c3x5GMkctduOtJK7Y86A@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Internet security.
From: Adam Carter <adamcarter3@gmail.com>
To: "gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org" <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e0160c35ea7fa9004e5edce41
X-Archives-Salt: a722fc17-b637-4a4f-a721-58f8387b00da
X-Archives-Hash: b85ef5d1cf798ac14c6e38186ceab871

--089e0160c35ea7fa9004e5edce41
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

>
> [2]
>
> http://michael.orlitzky.com/articles/why_im_against_ca-signed_certificates.php
> .
>

I like to state some of what you say here as "website certificates are only
as trusted as the LEAST trustworthy CA in the trusted certificate store"

--089e0160c35ea7fa9004e5edce41
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1

<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
[2]<br>
<a href="http://michael.orlitzky.com/articles/why_im_against_ca-signed_certificates.php" target="_blank">http://michael.orlitzky.com/articles/why_im_against_ca-signed_certificates.php</a><br>
.<br></blockquote></div><br>I like to state some of what you say here as &quot;website certificates are only as trusted as the LEAST trustworthy CA in the trusted certificate store&quot;<br></div></div>

--089e0160c35ea7fa9004e5edce41--