From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org)
	by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <gentoo-user+bounces-127507-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
	id 1QywO1-0007Gt-83
	for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 01 Sep 2011 01:48:09 +0000
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 26E7121C151;
	Thu,  1 Sep 2011 01:47:52 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-vw0-f53.google.com (mail-vw0-f53.google.com [209.85.212.53])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49D7421C137
	for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Thu,  1 Sep 2011 01:46:23 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by vws13 with SMTP id 13so1293362vws.40
        for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Wed, 31 Aug 2011 18:46:22 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type;
        bh=PpzCaLOReCBNfdxEs893kYa2/BqG6FrvG08S1ClhOO0=;
        b=QcC0JXC0Q5SLMyaqfuYVOQUQGRHsdLYUGbR6duCYC5Qi3m9jyAi7mx9ZVwx4ZIAzS5
         Ci6h2WZKKUKM8pXgtLnu6WqmYgKPwD+RnOUNGybMxbtP8MzbZiViCdipb5BO6H/481pJ
         wkUb2+Ch6T1hZHO+u0J+j8t1tThqMBXyjnDjc=
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.52.88.113 with SMTP id bf17mr1027028vdb.27.1314841582779; Wed,
 31 Aug 2011 18:46:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.220.178.194 with HTTP; Wed, 31 Aug 2011 18:46:22 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CA+czFiBmq65JAWPhgZPvRAis1gO_YGyTKoMx-ix4947tfq-g7w@mail.gmail.com>
References: <loom.20110831T150021-295@post.gmane.org>
	<CAC=wYCHjqnmGieCTL_yu7NZnNw4O9skon21H_vSuq=AKBQjMHQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CA+czFiBmq65JAWPhgZPvRAis1gO_YGyTKoMx-ix4947tfq-g7w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2011 11:46:22 +1000
Message-ID: <CAC=wYCF6=HUgjmRDb1W+gid4MOhQ=rkMPXNb2s3BCxQc5n8WQg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] 10 G eth (10000) on Gentoo
From: Adam Carter <adamcarter3@gmail.com>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-Archives-Salt: 
X-Archives-Hash: 0aff9014690aeb321d626a9117d580c7

> I've overheard IRC conversations that discussed multi-queue network
> cards in the context of multi-core systems. My educated guess, based
> on what you mention, is that each queue in the card would ping a
> different interrupt. Each interrupt might be handled by a different
> core, so you'd see a scaleable improvement there.

Nice - multi-queue was vapourware when i last looked. It would be
worth checking the driver source/doco to see what's there.