From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0FFD3139083 for ; Tue, 19 Dec 2017 00:42:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E444DE10C9; Tue, 19 Dec 2017 00:41:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ot0-x231.google.com (mail-ot0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c0f::231]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7ECDEE104F for ; Tue, 19 Dec 2017 00:41:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ot0-x231.google.com with SMTP id i1so14951195oth.9 for ; Mon, 18 Dec 2017 16:41:55 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=S+D0cYrwRaPERdsG/eprnXgOQWfuXh0ZMBaX4lhvfKQ=; b=AjMujQrDWwA74h5CqhcPrgEhTwdfKcRPgIZU+/MOQIQ/Kc8pqpkzRgxbhZmwEh3zEo WG+qhp5Bxk9Ej6MJpblCmYLGoOHFXef1RIvsz4Fr8oFzBrjNOiQHOgDfU7N/K+2e3eLh xtzp79f5BDtAu5RaBAbdcMM0Z6YIXlioI3H4NaQfZ0VaguPT3T0/8j+qr9GdMcOV6FUo PATagtAEB0TQOEI9lGFxP2qUx4KMIZrWtZfA2B53TzcM+00bdXVttK2a8RihICihnthr M8rXutwwB6NnhZ7Kg5tyy8uK6zLKYJndrS0mn7T1E61VKywayrpGH6JqKlseozrffpTi 8BWA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=S+D0cYrwRaPERdsG/eprnXgOQWfuXh0ZMBaX4lhvfKQ=; b=bOICShmtc0rSq172SKuyjbFzO7NxcBU43A7lzczZCgRbUQng4h7U04/tot9cvQAJ6z 9I0pDzpKiyEX8yqDBUAYRewpp3ZmK823eb7aT+e1+Q0mclQIN6yzV4nX38x0mWrCt9Za 8OhNlaZx6RhDphrZxpS/1viWevc18l3gnDGXCrzNuO+bQPE2+TEBLtt3/BQmA9bCnHx8 cxEqwfoyScjUhYKuo4oRI+2iFqxGcxz26kFA+lZrG9hJv8XPzwvI8OFv0ojpl+rEWlMG CaOnzTzUJy8TH4hFnT4J8MmDyGci7i+AICDCUx0RZz/z7p+5KbNoV/Pa6uLnooOwwNZs VG5A== X-Gm-Message-State: AKGB3mLnrQsEsne0B6xO4TYxa1xDnVOz8bZyGVNv3uwttl+ii6vf+22R Ymp2c2qUB7w3/TYC8Sz5imB8HdQrFICM8dkOf8daWA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACJfBotPDHIdlTlF1igaQuKjG/YbRpXiIGb3w37Odm078uae0LW1hs2LiC4uXeiE5ZJr/Vf86kzVBTKX+b7o5JGqVgc= X-Received: by 10.157.57.134 with SMTP id y6mr1110479otb.74.1513644114620; Mon, 18 Dec 2017 16:41:54 -0800 (PST) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.157.19.78 with HTTP; Mon, 18 Dec 2017 16:41:54 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <2656131.1oTTikaTYt@peak> References: <2410697.Nf28CZmUYN@peak> <2656131.1oTTikaTYt@peak> From: Adam Carter Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2017 11:41:54 +1100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Choice of TLD for internal network To: "gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org" Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a1141a318c4b6690560a6bb3f" X-Archives-Salt: 4318d1c4-7360-4746-89f6-ebbf55172111 X-Archives-Hash: a9348c4d364a9d0b4c6b32398b48a05e --001a1141a318c4b6690560a6bb3f Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 11:10 AM, Peter Humphrey wrote: > On Monday, 18 December 2017 09:49:41 GMT Adam Carter wrote: > > On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 1:05 PM, Peter Humphrey > > wrote: > > > I've been running Linux systems since 1994, calling my private LAN > mynet > > > (bowdlerised). Now I come to install neth server on one machine, it > > > insists that I tell it a domain name with at least two dots in it. > > > > That's dumb, and may be an omen on what the rest of it is like. > > Maybe not. See the debate at > https://community.nethserver.org/t/i-fell-at-the-first-hurdle/8563/4 > > I can't see any concrete info on why your original config was a problem, but a charitable read could amount to "given the interdependencies of the various components, the requirement for two dots in the FQDN was deemed the best compromise *for neth*". --001a1141a318c4b6690560a6bb3f Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On T= ue, Dec 19, 2017 at 11:10 AM, Peter Humphrey <peter@prh.myzen.co.uk> wrote:
On Monday, 18 Decemb= er 2017 09:49:41 GMT Adam Carter wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 1:05 PM, Peter Humphrey <peter@prh.myzen.co.uk>
> wrote:
> > I've been running Linux systems since 1994, calling my privat= e LAN mynet
> > (bowdlerised). Now I come to install neth server on one machine, = it
> > insists that I tell it a domain name with at least two dots in it= .
>
> That's dumb, and may be an omen on what the rest of it is like.
Maybe not. See the debate at
https://community.nethserver.org/t/i-fell-at-the-first-hurdle/8563/4


I can't see any concret= e info on why your original config was a problem, but a charitable read cou= ld amount to "given the interdependencies of the various components, t= he requirement for two dots in the FQDN was deemed the best compromise f= or neth".


--001a1141a318c4b6690560a6bb3f--