From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-user+bounces-187880-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D04A9138334
	for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Sun, 18 Aug 2019 08:30:54 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6EA2BE0A92;
	Sun, 18 Aug 2019 08:30:48 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-ot1-x336.google.com (mail-ot1-x336.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::336])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EED57E09E2
	for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Sun, 18 Aug 2019 08:30:47 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-ot1-x336.google.com with SMTP id g17so12567550otl.2
        for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Sun, 18 Aug 2019 01:30:47 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20161025;
        h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to;
        bh=ziNPtrWcf8dl5VJzlhy2JtaJKYD6lD8FvQqFbzphHUI=;
        b=ISQ913JG+XwOS7YjZXFl+O4AjsWx0xPVoagWtkm3Ut88JQt8USQAKOufH8U93C4n48
         vaFX29KGOXaKamSyuEs+HncyjGzpvyml3xD4B3RIn8E/ero6oNMkgJIjZOgyeDhiuRVw
         T63pQqcV9KgLegRishlrepqVThQrFDWMnFnEF/dmi9OwLO5IhZwafWp51h5yQ3xAujH/
         x3tS26lzXHtWS28298+GnLftaRvuiScHVbxYJP7NIOLqrXAiR1TP5XKhru9KT5lwbnW0
         nkAz3gD440wKOdW5VocdWXw7JkGhLZnK6Y2pGp6rzCpOU6BEZG4LrDgqb5cD60wFZEMU
         6mmA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
        h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date
         :message-id:subject:to;
        bh=ziNPtrWcf8dl5VJzlhy2JtaJKYD6lD8FvQqFbzphHUI=;
        b=qMd/cbxDj62CPBvG8ORV23mJOzu6sd7bM7JXBKxurjugGPEW/zdIv4oH1sDvhxXSlz
         +r3vk0206ZOmBAzH62myL9uO9xat+n26zRHyf/Pui3MCJ80RykhQpsjTf8qpNHVjOWGQ
         OfuFx4AmrV4psICoS3yAGXxo8WGro//AQDo03QATtY+60xCZODNlBn1W9qKvBmyUeUlG
         ignhfMd9XVYCZiLvqWlOyxirIiAHpkafFeHtdJQjFWN75bzoYJ3LGSEPZ/D1Z8CId3q+
         T+50rByG914oP4FJSKqAsg7SIuajoLFsoltLDZGdokvBsMik7Zhq13are7HBvsdsR6bo
         EsRQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUqB0WISBgsq4eKMZ5tSXtqMahc2CV2p/dZKEeseCj9BSGmChqC
	GeQLprU4L1n3YgjjEjQtqPpjlva31IiUqln+I5legA==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxjsvxkC6BSQeuIA94JQQn6Of1Zs1NBeLUBiZlv8tAPLh7HeL2854lMPBtC8PR2te6HkMJnbPtkJsbgcDoSojU=
X-Received: by 2002:a9d:f65:: with SMTP id 92mr13075219ott.24.1566117047044;
 Sun, 18 Aug 2019 01:30:47 -0700 (PDT)
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: DR, RN, NRN, OOF, AutoReply
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <3217537.KO732anV92@peak>
In-Reply-To: <3217537.KO732anV92@peak>
From: Adam Carter <adamcarter3@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 18 Aug 2019 18:30:36 +1000
Message-ID: <CAC=wYCEB5YUjhsrxUxu2=Z9x99X_LFPfN9aBZpX01iE+0MZ0oA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] NFS setup
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000004410d50590600aa9"
X-Archives-Salt: 040d27f9-1771-4f79-a6c8-fa9750eb238c
X-Archives-Hash: 93fbb68173fdf04bc245568fcaf133ab

--0000000000004410d50590600aa9
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"

On Sun, Aug 18, 2019 at 6:01 PM Peter Humphrey <peter@prh.myzen.co.uk>
wrote:

> On to the next problem...
>
> This workstation serves as compute host to two smaller boxes on the
> network. I
> NFS-mount the PORTDIR of the smaller box in a chroot on this one, then do
> emerging and so on to build packages which I install later on the smaller
> box.
>
> That works fine on one of the smaller boxes, but on the other I get a
> different port being used for NFS transfer every time.
>

 Is the output of 'mount | grep nfs' the same on the two client machines?

--0000000000004410d50590600aa9
Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div dir=3D"ltr"><div class=3D"gmail_quote"><div dir=3D"ltr" class=3D"gmail=
_attr">On Sun, Aug 18, 2019 at 6:01 PM Peter Humphrey &lt;<a href=3D"mailto=
:peter@prh.myzen.co.uk">peter@prh.myzen.co.uk</a>&gt; wrote:<br></div><bloc=
kquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:=
1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">On to the next problem...<br>
<br>
This workstation serves as compute host to two smaller boxes on the network=
. I <br>
NFS-mount the PORTDIR of the smaller box in a chroot on this one, then do <=
br>
emerging and so on to build packages which I install later on the smaller b=
ox.<br>
<br>
That works fine on one of the smaller boxes, but on the other I get a <br>
different port being used for NFS transfer every time.<br></blockquote><div=
><br></div><div>=C2=A0Is the output of &#39;mount | grep nfs&#39; the same =
on the two client machines?<br></div></div></div>

--0000000000004410d50590600aa9--