From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB203138E20 for ; Fri, 21 Feb 2014 01:03:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 93CE5E0AF3; Fri, 21 Feb 2014 01:03:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-yk0-f194.google.com (mail-yk0-f194.google.com [209.85.160.194]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8CC00E09E0 for ; Fri, 21 Feb 2014 01:03:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-yk0-f194.google.com with SMTP id 9so825345ykp.1 for ; Thu, 20 Feb 2014 17:03:20 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=KLLLEJzUSgmyVC/yFBsn+2I+k+e7KuM1bGj/MX2h6pM=; b=o2/4oJS1to+qKPsJyqOFC9Sw4f+ng+T8RgCsbGZlFk8OBWOjDvES9UIlja+I+b0nq6 AwzqN2kngjmkqQCnBjtmIm4OEGIbIpYDd+Jf34E6DIdmzZ12xcFYYTbZFPrzrrLkZ4tI anrHKyW7M7gqw2lW8eAA+xC/IFTsqPM/x5vcSx5hfO6QW81w/RNp4phPXDGpSNUnCJFj OfhzMb4Aq+Q1mBugimAbifIRLpcR9oZC0dRhLVIlKFYN31BMqh3HW5IveDyuvT4WHKX0 rQzpqPb0HNSfR/Wt9mHSgdXw9Fl9GwfCH3sCJ2PsIfu5cCzAWNyiUBRDuM04FhHNq94P 3dxQ== Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.236.168.166 with SMTP id k26mr7574700yhl.64.1392944600630; Thu, 20 Feb 2014 17:03:20 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.170.40.71 with HTTP; Thu, 20 Feb 2014 17:03:20 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.170.40.71 with HTTP; Thu, 20 Feb 2014 17:03:20 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <5305EF52.7030303@libertytrek.org> References: <5297F0C8.3060403@gmail.com> <5305410B.1090403@gmail.com> <53054E16.70708@gmail.com> <5305EF52.7030303@libertytrek.org> Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2014 22:03:20 -0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Fwd: How about the gentoo server or cluster in production environment? From: Facundo Curti To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=20cf3040edba1ce58a04f2e03011 X-Archives-Salt: fa4d2d0e-7cd4-4a91-8ead-849b9425b4de X-Archives-Hash: 739683e2a0b45c4a11a89d80ad2283fc --20cf3040edba1ce58a04f2e03011 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 > the advantage of clustering servers though is you can take one out and update it. if you use a distributed compliation [1] and tell portage to keep the binaries [2] you can take a few out and do them together, then the remainder do not require compilation as the compile has been It is True. I didnt throught on thath. :) >That is such total FUD I just can't even say anything else about it without using some unsavory words. You no need to be disrespectfull... It just was my opinion, and everybody are here to learn... Everybody say good points. I think it is just a matter of taste. I hope get the chance to try gentoo as server someday. For now, i just stay in debian. (And my lovely gentoo as desktop, of course). Bye! ;) --20cf3040edba1ce58a04f2e03011 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

> the advantage of clustering servers though is you can t= ake one out and update it.=C2=A0=C2=A0 if you use a distributed compliation= [1] and tell portage to keep the binaries [2] you can take a few out and d= o them together, then the remainder do not require compilation as the compi= le has been

It is True. I didnt throught on thath. :)

>That is such total FUD I just can't even say anythin= g else about it without using some unsavory words.

You no need to be disrespectfull... It just was my opinion, = and everybody are here to learn...

Everybody say good points. I think it is just a matter of ta= ste.
I hope get the chance to try gentoo as server someday. For now, i just stay= in debian. (And my lovely gentoo as desktop, of course).

Bye! ;)

--20cf3040edba1ce58a04f2e03011--