From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1RxPyE-0006ik-RN for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 14 Feb 2012 21:31:31 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2411DE0D33; Tue, 14 Feb 2012 21:31:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ee0-f53.google.com (mail-ee0-f53.google.com [74.125.83.53]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBE3DE0CCD for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2012 21:29:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: by eeke51 with SMTP id e51so162033eek.40 for ; Tue, 14 Feb 2012 13:29:57 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=tFZl5piL0xxPFpvafZTiUqUPZzFFU9VvP0AzufX332A=; b=dV6D1q0j3g+/COY9KZBe81DKGn/Iy53TENtE2Nlj/Ks0a16HFuQa/oeW9dIJQ9Bjqq fGHuPEO3UoKHQE7VSTSHUAYrzQuPeLja2K4X8H8M5sWinb0VkHQqTR7cFTDVk3tP2SGM dmDozm9Nixwnsifxvmzay8n4QzKhepvoo7Kxc= Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.213.14.72 with SMTP id f8mr804536eba.29.1329254997169; Tue, 14 Feb 2012 13:29:57 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.14.32.65 with HTTP; Tue, 14 Feb 2012 13:29:57 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.14.32.65 with HTTP; Tue, 14 Feb 2012 13:29:57 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2012 16:29:57 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Alternative to firefox? From: Alecks Gates To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0015174c1176ec168b04b8f34b8f X-Archives-Salt: 953368a1-fb58-4147-a6c2-2864c28ff842 X-Archives-Hash: a278650f74e2516a8aaae19d1de66573 --0015174c1176ec168b04b8f34b8f Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Feb 14, 2012 4:16 PM, "Paul Hartman" wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 2:41 PM, Grant wrote: > > Has anyone found a GUI alternative to firefox they like that's in > > portage? Something minimal preferably but with flash support? > > Chromium/Chrome, Opera, Konqueror... flash works in all of those and > are all fast and minimalistic compared to Firefox. Probably Epiphany, > too, but I don't use Gnome so I haven't tried it in years. > Firefox is quite fast and is also the only browser I've found that can easily manage hundreds of tabs + amazing addons. Firefox has no true alternative, if you consider everything. The last time I tried Epiphany flash didn't appear to work out of the box, but I might have done something wrong too. --0015174c1176ec168b04b8f34b8f Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable


On Feb 14, 2012 4:16 PM, "Paul Hartman" <paul.hartman+gentoo@gmail.com> wrote:<= br> >
> On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 2:41 PM, Grant <emailgrant@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Has anyone found a GUI alternative to firefox they like that'= s in
> > portage? =A0Something minimal preferably but with flash support?<= br> >
> Chromium/Chrome, Opera, Konqueror... flash works in all of those and > are all fast and minimalistic compared to Firefox. Probably Epiphany,<= br> > too, but I don't use Gnome so I haven't tried it in years.
>
Firefox is quite fast and is also the only browser I've found that can = easily manage hundreds of tabs + amazing addons.=A0 Firefox has no true alt= ernative, if you consider everything.=A0 The last time I tried Epiphany fla= sh didn't appear to work out of the box, but I might have done somethin= g wrong too.

--0015174c1176ec168b04b8f34b8f--