From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org)
by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
(envelope-from <gentoo-user+bounces-134839-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
id 1RxPdv-00042k-T7
for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 14 Feb 2012 21:10:32 +0000
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 84603E0BF4;
Tue, 14 Feb 2012 21:08:53 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-ey0-f181.google.com (mail-ey0-f181.google.com [209.85.215.181])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E485BE0BC2
for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Tue, 14 Feb 2012 20:58:20 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by eaak14 with SMTP id k14so136901eaa.40
for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Tue, 14 Feb 2012 12:58:20 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
:content-type;
bh=VcNFhN+U8kUyh17TCrpzG+1ehVHKMCPml4c/FJZ9UZw=;
b=vX9SUXFcdKFuPhALZoYMz2m2R5OmELu2iKawpaFUnAMmHU6iuFVg5S/+pF8URER0I7
OWX0ftc+HUOz3wDtGf56dpyiu+7GGwZpP1lww44QBPaUNLUkqfBz+Vbp9wUNsw9o0H7G
xe0WKeWdivLa/7rzcPBJE7nK2bHqYC9gXqd54=
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.14.28.75 with SMTP id f51mr7257269eea.118.1329253100134; Tue,
14 Feb 2012 12:58:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.14.32.65 with HTTP; Tue, 14 Feb 2012 12:58:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.14.32.65 with HTTP; Tue, 14 Feb 2012 12:58:20 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CAN0CFw2iCtd+Tip23w0EXdm5SEMhTajsHhn=Lp_gHXE0528_xQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAN0CFw2iCtd+Tip23w0EXdm5SEMhTajsHhn=Lp_gHXE0528_xQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2012 15:58:20 -0500
Message-ID: <CABMYmBZ=7G8wNav0bVOXy58MjjoRFcMOpoCRKePMqw2r3JucuQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Alternative to firefox?
From: Alecks Gates <fuzzylunkinz@gmail.com>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=bcaec52be3fbd9a24804b8f2da6a
X-Archives-Salt: 6e643927-8809-4f06-9f16-de33fb4fb690
X-Archives-Hash: ea9813dfc2c7c2467fe83adbc99d888e
--bcaec52be3fbd9a24804b8f2da6a
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
On Feb 14, 2012 3:42 PM, "Grant" <emailgrant@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Has anyone found a GUI alternative to firefox they like that's in
> portage? Something minimal preferably but with flash support?
>
> - Grant
>
Midori is quite minimal and has flash support last I checked. It's very
lightweight on the features, which can be good and bad :). Personally I
get tired of new chromium and v8 builds every week.
--bcaec52be3fbd9a24804b8f2da6a
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<p><br>
On Feb 14, 2012 3:42 PM, "Grant" <<a href=3D"mailto:emailgrant=
@gmail.com">emailgrant@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
><br>
> Has anyone found a GUI alternative to firefox they like that's in<=
br>
> portage? =A0Something minimal preferably but with flash support?<br>
><br>
> - Grant<br>
><br>
Midori is quite minimal and has flash support last I checked.=A0 It's v=
ery lightweight on the features, which can be good and bad :).=A0 Personall=
y I get tired of new chromium and v8 builds every week.</p>
--bcaec52be3fbd9a24804b8f2da6a--