From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1R0atw-0005CM-4I for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 05 Sep 2011 15:15:56 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 79EAA21C161; Mon, 5 Sep 2011 15:15:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-qw0-f48.google.com (mail-qw0-f48.google.com [209.85.216.48]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D85F21C155 for ; Mon, 5 Sep 2011 15:14:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qwj9 with SMTP id 9so3877832qwj.21 for ; Mon, 05 Sep 2011 08:14:08 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=Yw6RDZHBsVehFRlES1AvRKVm/P8csv2TFe/azMFjOCs=; b=S+7kieWPzULr4olM86mto5X/isP+RI6vFMb9Skyv0ibPkmmAQcFHZWsq/1347hFDHO gX/3KBQXWB5wAUbPU+V9B05ebf+uIRVKdBblSs3I+6s8525AYqM2UnlWoMA2DKwtB+UZ AaNiYIBtfwoxd/nveRf3lgY1qqu88Equ63LQw= Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.42.138 with SMTP id s10mr3049495qce.176.1315235648590; Mon, 05 Sep 2011 08:14:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.229.80.85 with HTTP; Mon, 5 Sep 2011 08:14:08 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 5 Sep 2011 17:14:08 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: del.uged want to start on net.eth1, only eth0 is there From: Lars Madson To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=00163683242ca1525e04ac3329bc X-Archives-Salt: X-Archives-Hash: b172df6fa0788f90fdd80450208c8514 --00163683242ca1525e04ac3329bc Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Yes I have only one ethernet adapter, eth0. My /etc/init.d/net.eth1 is a symlink to net.lo I can remove it. But shouldn't it be a /etc/init.d/net.eth0 ? my udev rule seems alright. thx Laurent 2011/9/4 walt > On 09/04/2011 06:27 AM, Lars Madson wrote: > > Hi, > > > > After upgrading world, I might have gone a bit fast on the last conf > files that I update with etc-update. > > Now that I restart deluged, the init script brings up eth1 but I only > have eth0 correctly setup. > > It should use eth0. In rc-update list I see net.eth1, no net.eth0, if it > can help. > > > > My question is when this net.eth1 is called so that I could fix this > wrong routing? > > If you are using only one ethernet adapter then you should remove > /etc/init.d/net.eth1. > > If eth1 seems to exist somewhere but it really shouldn't exist, then > you should delete /etc/udev/rules.d/70-persistent-net.rules and reboot. > That should get rid of eth1. > > If you really have two ethernet adapters then my answer is probably wrong. > > > --00163683242ca1525e04ac3329bc Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Yes I have only one ethernet adapter, eth0.
My /etc/in= it.d/net.eth1 is a symlink to net.lo
I can remove it.
B= ut shouldn't it be a /etc/init.d/net.eth0 ?

my= udev rule seems alright.

thx
Laurent

2011/9/4 walt <w4= 1ter@gmail.com>
On 09/04/2011 06:27 AM, Lars Madson wrote= :
> Hi,
>
> After upgrading world, I might have gone a bit fast on the last conf f= iles that I update with etc-update.
> Now that I restart deluged, the init script brings up eth1 but I only = have eth0 correctly setup.
> It should use eth0. In rc-update list I see net.eth1, no net.eth0, if = it can help.
>
> My question is when this net.eth1 is called so that I could fix this w= rong routing?

If you are using only one ethernet adapter then you should remo= ve
/etc/init.d/net.eth1.

If eth1 seems to exist somewhere but it really shouldn't exist, then you should delete /etc/udev/rules.d/70-persistent-net.rules and reboot.
That should get rid of eth1.

If you really have two ethernet adapters then my answer is probably wrong.<= br>


--00163683242ca1525e04ac3329bc--