From: Lars Madson <rwx700@gmail.com>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: del.uged want to start on net.eth1, only eth0 is there
Date: Mon, 5 Sep 2011 17:14:08 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAB6h_EC=1ogc=EX4Dr828cJj8amPUoF945yM8eT2-iPa6V4GiA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <j409hn$onr$1@dough.gmane.org>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1042 bytes --]
Yes I have only one ethernet adapter, eth0.
My /etc/init.d/net.eth1 is a symlink to net.lo
I can remove it.
But shouldn't it be a /etc/init.d/net.eth0 ?
my udev rule seems alright.
thx
Laurent
2011/9/4 walt <w41ter@gmail.com>
> On 09/04/2011 06:27 AM, Lars Madson wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > After upgrading world, I might have gone a bit fast on the last conf
> files that I update with etc-update.
> > Now that I restart deluged, the init script brings up eth1 but I only
> have eth0 correctly setup.
> > It should use eth0. In rc-update list I see net.eth1, no net.eth0, if it
> can help.
> >
> > My question is when this net.eth1 is called so that I could fix this
> wrong routing?
>
> If you are using only one ethernet adapter then you should remove
> /etc/init.d/net.eth1.
>
> If eth1 seems to exist somewhere but it really shouldn't exist, then
> you should delete /etc/udev/rules.d/70-persistent-net.rules and reboot.
> That should get rid of eth1.
>
> If you really have two ethernet adapters then my answer is probably wrong.
>
>
>
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 1508 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-09-05 15:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-09-04 13:27 [gentoo-user] del.uged want to start on net.eth1, only eth0 is there Lars Madson
2011-09-04 14:12 ` Dale
2011-09-04 14:55 ` Lars Madson
2011-09-04 16:10 ` Dale
2011-09-04 16:29 ` Mark Knecht
2011-09-04 16:38 ` [gentoo-user] " walt
2011-09-05 15:14 ` Lars Madson [this message]
2011-09-05 18:24 ` [gentoo-user] " walt
2011-09-06 12:40 ` Lars Madson
2011-09-06 14:18 ` Dale
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAB6h_EC=1ogc=EX4Dr828cJj8amPUoF945yM8eT2-iPa6V4GiA@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=rwx700@gmail.com \
--cc=gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox