From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 585D3139083 for ; Sun, 17 Dec 2017 19:21:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4CD57E0E00; Sun, 17 Dec 2017 19:21:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-yb0-x242.google.com (mail-yb0-x242.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c09::242]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D9DD6E0BE6 for ; Sun, 17 Dec 2017 19:21:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-yb0-x242.google.com with SMTP id z11so9631303ybm.1 for ; Sun, 17 Dec 2017 11:21:00 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=zqvhod5Cp1ivd8ittGIoZrUpK/rn83MW0EldzolzM6o=; b=rfX9/2AleRtsPpw5vW1bjSACsvJBprW6OQt7u4HSYNY2pLpiP3Ias+DIh3wljXvJ8L iPelU7pZmjy8+krKkJ2ZbovdcW/sEZB6JNeRSH+4Hqe92t4WYh4WNv4HwPqJ0sTRjBeF vqeruoVlY0jk7+9X/X+g35BHiUFaul2i17zxgYgRswH/cr6OeHF5VNEUenUqoypVZQqT waKJquha5vMblX7mDwbrMzUof7dM8zNeEXeIpAH2ihNcp+zK0WhTVTmjTb8iL0rHTTjI NvlatH9Nrz8Ch0X02fCvksjPYiJ0w2rExBMM2vo88rNzKJCk+V87SR+a3lQNGFKooRPo u/8A== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=zqvhod5Cp1ivd8ittGIoZrUpK/rn83MW0EldzolzM6o=; b=Q6WLP0p7NIfKStWJsOb5Ha07KRBft+aiwVw81sBLn3dkmRZSb/vwk+ZlFTQ4KLimgl 6LsKtfO0nzSzwI4QqlilsWQtkxUl5SBmNO2ZbyhyYmSVhA29nSkWzsZyMY+gpYctxWqC W36s1BYmzAdZfXxl6aGJ+l9d6/ES82K9bF7xB/PR39QjQkcsoLcJJ9hXh3EzXoVMdLEv ZjabaMGnD2p95p4laEnuQJdd9zm4BiZ5vy+Myh97fcKWY+lFTbU+xrKarVwIQ0Oyq3wI 1DbcaVsqRsaYyD+NOzAS/YWaZsxRwFnqawEousfFFRemeK9o8QYV9oSvMZI7r9r+zPBy ChXA== X-Gm-Message-State: AKGB3mIfrwEYIGNMENyPJnE+OzmnBvzjmKbClSo0YS/3qGySj9J2iAkV IQfFgKv4d2O3rDT7ye/NIujYLwl5po5G9VhN1wo= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACJfBou95PtClzwpOZpO6JInNxzI3P8MvDe2+b69zPoMYnT1JxNMfwtBlTkcC6l7WFNg8kzrd+/rJnZUN01ZrEzRAzo= X-Received: by 10.37.35.4 with SMTP id j4mr12679182ybj.105.1513538459413; Sun, 17 Dec 2017 11:20:59 -0800 (PST) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.13.224.71 with HTTP; Sun, 17 Dec 2017 11:20:58 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <1513520087.1654.3.camel@gentoo.org> References: <46280df3-c0d6-dad5-2e29-bbe5d70ee22e@iinet.net.au> <1513520087.1654.3.camel@gentoo.org> From: R0b0t1 Date: Sun, 17 Dec 2017 13:20:58 -0600 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] cross compiling arm with 17 profiles. To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Archives-Salt: 162f503d-b1e7-4e86-917a-437da35f9e85 X-Archives-Hash: b2fef4b3ff54f798f096ca23adfd4f8c Hello, On Sun, Dec 17, 2017 at 8:14 AM, Mart Raudsepp wrote: > On P, 2017-12-17 at 16:50 +0800, Bill Kenworthy wrote: >> Something I cant figure out: >> >> ARM is still on the 13 profiles - should an amd64 system used to >> cross >> compile for arm (Raspberry Pi's) be left on the 13 profiles or 17 >> will >> work fine? > > ARM profiles are delayed to potentially fix CHOSTs together with the > profile update. Though no-one is actively doing the work to my > knowledge right now. > > I guess it could cause trouble from default PIE vs no PIE from native > compiler, but I don't know enough about that field to know for sure. > If you know anything at all that is more than myself, so can you link to past discussions that you are aware of? > If you pay attention to any future CHOST changes and handle them > yourself at the right time, you could manually choose the appropriate > 17.0 arm profile as your symlink (it doesn't show up in eselect profile > due to no profiles.desc entry, but should be there in profiles/). If > changes are done, you might be caught a bit off-guard though at the > time they are done though and I'm not sure what the effects of that > would be either (probably not too bad). > My experience with ARM(64) is that it is mature enough that you can expect @system to work unless proven otherwise. Lots of other packages have failures. Cheers, R0b0t1