From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-user+bounces-163873-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
	by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B285138CA2
	for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Wed, 22 Apr 2015 08:01:02 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 79E7CE089C;
	Wed, 22 Apr 2015 08:00:56 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-ig0-f180.google.com (mail-ig0-f180.google.com [209.85.213.180])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 532B2E0869
	for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Wed, 22 Apr 2015 08:00:55 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by igbyr2 with SMTP id yr2so107206722igb.0
        for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Wed, 22 Apr 2015 01:00:54 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type;
        bh=YI9jcKo6zsE3jaMGu5m+ipBnA1B2zKc0PIs1tN/tKM4=;
        b=aSFI+npi/muarIm1b8+sgPHzWKy3EAqBwE2SppAnBg/h4Q3yiksjf3tVJtBCz0UWns
         kpHl1aeB15OQXFVCLQn69cIAgoGW58ASOWRGEZa6+S2ATWezFWOdA8MNEESIkPxTr2U2
         wF7VoXQ3TlAHbrQlATKmFsTmbhxeLNx+9kXGqDDgSw5DsjS6KcHAMrHaNALfAtf25TLN
         exdoruIpNVuXFAlAo91NBPROjctJMnbk8HO4z9/sF8vWNjTXGkJYwiYNcX8tb/HjXJi6
         VCnNJU0brnLtdO1KJfyGEpjfpLOHzRBGryCIkJHuH7b4AtyujyULEpBXmTW5VmwGl5W0
         yEWw==
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.107.131.87 with SMTP id f84mr34779244iod.50.1429689654864;
 Wed, 22 Apr 2015 01:00:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.64.246.197 with HTTP; Wed, 22 Apr 2015 01:00:54 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <55374793.2010900@gmail.com>
References: <CAJ1xhMW=naRWznMN1WWzUetq-qs0Y5OTd4L9y3N3PtfCrPrxxg@mail.gmail.com>
	<5535E331.1040508@gmail.com>
	<CAJ1xhMXt1VJgLkjtexAx=0yzA1_upydYQEOOoO1H1Wj4B5aFVw@mail.gmail.com>
	<553734A7.2080608@gmail.com>
	<55373B2E.80704@gmail.com>
	<55374587.9060701@gmail.com>
	<55374793.2010900@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2015 03:00:54 -0500
Message-ID: <CAAD4mYiOfFyMza98Ug30OV+Uor+ebDUfpB-fysaD21E4HjdaGw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] stable java virtuals require unstable java packages
From: R0b0t1 <r030t1@gmail.com>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-Archives-Salt: 9113e725-dc97-422c-9e17-4408dbef5da0
X-Archives-Hash: 4166b6ececb41ed5ca179da4e1d465a4

I've been using 1.7 for some time now, I wouldn't have too many qualms using it.