From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-user+bounces-179842-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C18A31396D0
for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Fri, 8 Sep 2017 00:00:19 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7C6FBE0CA7;
Fri, 8 Sep 2017 00:00:13 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-yw0-x231.google.com (mail-yw0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c05::231])
(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 19B15E0AC9
for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Fri, 8 Sep 2017 00:00:12 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-yw0-x231.google.com with SMTP id s62so3479608ywg.0
for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Thu, 07 Sep 2017 17:00:12 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=gmail.com; s=20161025;
h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to;
bh=L6mm/56DsBbdozuHjore7HC8UZPyF3SyG7yrSGxVeAc=;
b=owpUthf3hT28djtEOvMOQb/mZMD1m6dubsBSueCN1aAwrCSnvjpkvJQl95hlsqtE0E
Rc98hImPbghsBdQrqAZlv+H7WBF2T3EsRo14MRm283O1UlSLfaGARnnCOkZ40dAlhb60
eD77uU4Xez7BUdz1OkRKqj8v3T3iJqkU9wv6l5IN/reE0GH9/JopyySTdUHRp+VzBQGs
Dr2/+fkasANZfrT4C82JtJrXGD0YDg4+w6BT44NXMiBqLrediTPaG9X/QWdnHi3lHRvl
aQmz22Eo7ua9zDEkuQIb8NzjPNToVEK1sapX0WWaibqnh8sPC+eoz1GRJVdKwmcmK1vg
H9LA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date
:message-id:subject:to;
bh=L6mm/56DsBbdozuHjore7HC8UZPyF3SyG7yrSGxVeAc=;
b=RNdGy2CAnddHHH65tvWE24HrUXh8J2KUnl/lW7JFEYsqaeBukQvwo0YsQTf3d7DjCK
z6DiuMMjzafbjNlILdt+0q5q2MVneF+OM2LwnU4IkVsLVEmcDSiqYp4/JORfuO8KKDRf
5bUfUFs3oQdyfhxTzXKbi+xavgPcqg5lvD0GmkdA0UmCqRZXqPHiuF/0xR7MHfUhLrA+
wQ9sCQe6hvseI0x6o9Djk2tqn8+7cI+1hu0MWZLRdD/qyslh48g1L7BbboDDOsZK70q1
/qvQ0h/KUo3Ewj03k4XVnZAB7XBrhWsQVuTk7sR8SsQHuVBCHHllsGogtttz95TZaZNN
TH+g==
X-Gm-Message-State: AHPjjUhTM1MRqF3OzcVMDf+MfMB/9qbPWdlyZFyYrKipAWxvF+e3MpQC
5eyOfSHgjzmyMhQXKHau2F9zAgLXeg==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADKCNb7kxR3hde6FcLLAbzctFrIy8bUj5LapxS0vuPTGJThP8YThfBCliQhjzzhOoWr6tq68bjSSJb4Ks6hndIlZqOA=
X-Received: by 10.129.82.73 with SMTP id g70mr1019576ywb.218.1504828811693;
Thu, 07 Sep 2017 17:00:11 -0700 (PDT)
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.129.211.10 with HTTP; Thu, 7 Sep 2017 17:00:10 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAJnmqwY2kmE10JCaH9uHPMyXgE4ahvGOU1fYQZPpO1dQ2nAVnw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <87a8264rvb.fsf@gmail.com> <CAJnmqwY2kmE10JCaH9uHPMyXgE4ahvGOU1fYQZPpO1dQ2nAVnw@mail.gmail.com>
From: R0b0t1 <r030t1@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2017 19:00:10 -0500
Message-ID: <CAAD4mYgp_11F+JDdB-Jmem4ASm6Ro6rgBr7ex2TPyjqR=9N2DA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] What do you think about Firefox 57?
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Archives-Salt: 10b42a26-c8d1-49aa-a602-5388aac5fa56
X-Archives-Hash: fe68ac56884d826c06b61fefd63a2085
On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 7:38 AM, konsolebox <konsolebox@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 8:26 PM, Danny YUE <sheepduke@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Afterwards I found that it seems Firefox 57 will use a new ecosystem for
>> extensions and be more strict for plugin developers.
>>
>> So Firefox gurus, what do you think about it?
>
> Not a guru, but if it's something that enhances add-on security
> without sacrificing flexibility, I don't mind.
>
I've seen some questionable choices w.r.t. security being made. Things
aren't being made less secure, but choices made in the interest of
security don't really seem to relate to it. The last big extension
update was like that. There was some easy way to get around the
sandbox that Mozilla made for Firefox.
This update will break my favorite extension, Vimperator. I am already
looking at replacements for Firefox due to this. So far I have found
qutebrowser which isn't really as featureful.
R0b0t1.