From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-user+bounces-143461-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
	by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C6881381F3
	for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Mon, 17 Dec 2012 05:56:01 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E59CC21C015;
	Mon, 17 Dec 2012 05:55:46 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from svr-us4.tirtonadi.com (svr-us4.tirtonadi.com [69.65.43.212])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0251C21C015
	for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Mon, 17 Dec 2012 05:54:37 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-pa0-f53.google.com ([209.85.220.53]:50164)
	by svr-us4.tirtonadi.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
	(Exim 4.80)
	(envelope-from <pandu@poluan.info>)
	id 1TkTew-000L1r-0n
	for gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org; Mon, 17 Dec 2012 12:54:38 +0700
Received: by mail-pa0-f53.google.com with SMTP id hz1so3450002pad.40
        for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Sun, 16 Dec 2012 21:54:36 -0800 (PST)
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.68.227.41 with SMTP id rx9mr29704826pbc.121.1355723676133;
 Sun, 16 Dec 2012 21:54:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.68.17.199 with HTTP; Sun, 16 Dec 2012 21:54:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.68.17.199 with HTTP; Sun, 16 Dec 2012 21:54:35 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CAA2qdGWkfmiQVAKb76wq57scQ-T5p2U7HE4VdN8BnTX0oZHS1g@mail.gmail.com>
References: <50CB1942.3020900@gmail.com>
	<CAK2H+ecMZ5JO+SGBAdwhGO0HnB8Za-6_EaS1OiQcEJ03a0iQVg@mail.gmail.com>
	<50CB4A3C.1030109@gmail.com>
	<CAK2H+ecBb-nJ-ZY1efRT+sNCq6v9xgWnwL4GVpY-2j-GNTpJeA@mail.gmail.com>
	<50CB5406.7040404@gmail.com>
	<CAK2H+efpby+2NnbjReXyGjN3=Xe63j_2K69kCZjDhZcHvjusdA@mail.gmail.com>
	<8738z7hgsa.fsf@ist.utl.pt>
	<20121216171043.71084070@khamul.example.com>
	<20121216184953.GD16560@server>
	<876241d9gn.fsf@ist.utl.pt>
	<20121217002613.294cff70@kc-sys.chadwicks.me.uk>
	<CAA2qdGWkfmiQVAKb76wq57scQ-T5p2U7HE4VdN8BnTX0oZHS1g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2012 12:54:35 +0700
Message-ID: <CAA2qdGXzm99prdZ2jvuSB1bka84vEEUmJG7X1KEUYkO3FD11FA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Anyone switched to eudev yet?
From: Pandu Poluan <pandu@poluan.info>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=e89a8ff1ce7621287204d106040b
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - svr-us4.tirtonadi.com
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - lists.gentoo.org
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - poluan.info
X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: svr-us4.tirtonadi.com: authenticated_id: rileyer+pandu.poluan.info/only user confirmed/virtual account not confirmed
X-Archives-Salt: 110bd0b8-2116-4711-bad5-a4ecdf4a2bf9
X-Archives-Hash: d0ae1b5d52a3d8271aa00c6039f2583e

--e89a8ff1ce7621287204d106040b
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

On Dec 17, 2012 7:31 AM, "Kevin Chadwick" <ma1l1ists@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
>
> On Sun, 16 Dec 2012 22:32:24 +0200
> nunojsilva@ist.utl.pt (Nuno J. Silva) wrote:
>
> > My thanks, too! There's nothing like reading on some actual experience
> > with this. So this was once the reason to keep / separate. Not that
> > important anymore (but this is still no excuse to force people to keep
> > /usr in the same filesystem).
>
> Sorry but real world data is important and I am fully aware of the
> academic theorist problems compared to practical experience but this
> simply doesn't apply here. I didn't see any evidence or
> argument that a larger root conducting millions more writes is as safe
> as a smaller read only one perhaos not touched for months.
>
> The testing criteria were very generally put and just because an
> earthquake hasn't hit 200 building in the last 50 years is no reason to
> remove shock absorbers or other measures from sky scrapers.
>

This.

My desire to separate / and /usr are more for minimizing possible problems
with the filesystem. Yes, I can mount /usr ro, but sooner or later I have
to mount it rw, and as Murphy's Law dictates, it's exactly at that moment
something bad will happen.

Rgds,
--

--e89a8ff1ce7621287204d106040b
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<p><br>
On Dec 17, 2012 7:31 AM, &quot;Kevin Chadwick&quot; &lt;<a href=3D"mailto:m=
a1l1ists@yahoo.co.uk">ma1l1ists@yahoo.co.uk</a>&gt; wrote:<br>
&gt;<br>
&gt; On Sun, 16 Dec 2012 22:32:24 +0200<br>
&gt; <a href=3D"mailto:nunojsilva@ist.utl.pt">nunojsilva@ist.utl.pt</a> (Nu=
no J. Silva) wrote:<br>
&gt;<br>
&gt; &gt; My thanks, too! There&#39;s nothing like reading on some actual e=
xperience<br>
&gt; &gt; with this. So this was once the reason to keep / separate. Not th=
at<br>
&gt; &gt; important anymore (but this is still no excuse to force people to=
 keep<br>
&gt; &gt; /usr in the same filesystem).<br>
&gt;<br>
&gt; Sorry but real world data is important and I am fully aware of the<br>
&gt; academic theorist problems compared to practical experience but this<b=
r>
&gt; simply doesn&#39;t apply here. I didn&#39;t see any evidence or<br>
&gt; argument that a larger root conducting millions more writes is as safe=
<br>
&gt; as a smaller read only one perhaos not touched for months.<br>
&gt;<br>
&gt; The testing criteria were very generally put and just because an<br>
&gt; earthquake hasn&#39;t hit 200 building in the last 50 years is no reas=
on to<br>
&gt; remove shock absorbers or other measures from sky scrapers.<br>
&gt;</p>
<p>This. </p>
<p>My desire to separate / and /usr are more for minimizing possible proble=
ms with the filesystem. Yes, I can mount /usr ro, but sooner or later I hav=
e to mount it rw, and as Murphy&#39;s Law dictates, it&#39;s exactly at tha=
t moment something bad will happen. </p>

<p>Rgds, <br>
--<br>
</p>

--e89a8ff1ce7621287204d106040b--