From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1R0zs0-0000HC-DF for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 06 Sep 2011 17:55:36 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 319AE21C2AA; Tue, 6 Sep 2011 17:55:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from svr-us4.tirtonadi.com (unknown [69.65.43.212]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5DB721C270 for ; Tue, 6 Sep 2011 17:52:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-fx0-f53.google.com ([209.85.161.53]) by svr-us4.tirtonadi.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1R0zon-000Af1-VG for Gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org; Wed, 07 Sep 2011 00:52:18 +0700 Received: by fxd23 with SMTP id 23so12067fxd.40 for ; Tue, 06 Sep 2011 10:52:10 -0700 (PDT) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.223.25.151 with SMTP id z23mr257070fab.45.1315331530134; Tue, 06 Sep 2011 10:52:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.223.95.207 with HTTP; Tue, 6 Sep 2011 10:52:09 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Wed, 7 Sep 2011 00:52:09 +0700 Message-ID: Subject: [gentoo-user] Re: Filesystem with lowest CPU load, acceptable emerge performance, and stable? From: Pandu Poluan To: gentoo-user Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - svr-us4.tirtonadi.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - lists.gentoo.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - poluan.info X-Archives-Salt: X-Archives-Hash: 4ae03c2b408d4070526f29a51c054c29 Sorry, forgot one thing: For the time being, I'm sticking with 2.6.39-hardened. Saw too many incompatibility bug with 3.0 (due to packages hard-wired to expect the kernel version to begin with "2.6"). Rgds, On 2011-09-07, Pandu Poluan wrote: > So, can anyone recommend me a filesystem that fulfills my following needs: > > Scenario: vFirewall (virtual Firewall) that is going to be deployed at > my IaaS Cloud Provider. > > Disk I/O Characteristic: Occasional writes during 'normal' usage, > once-a-week eix-sync + emerge -avuD > > Priority: Stable (i.e., less chance of corruption), least CPU usage. > > My Google-Fu seems to indicate either XFS or JFS; what do you think? > > Rgds, > > > -- > -- > Pandu E Poluan - IT Optimizer > My website: http://pandu.poluan.info/ > -- -- Pandu E Poluan - IT Optimizer My website: http://pandu.poluan.info/