From: Pandu Poluan <pandu@poluan.info>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] requirements for a gentoo wlan accesspoint
Date: Fri, 6 Jan 2012 22:43:44 +0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAA2qdGX8fhh0bAPff9LgyGPbJzMB4C_4Sqdjq4+-xOLKsums9w@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5ECBAD3F-CDEC-47EB-982F-FD867272FCEF@stellar.eclipse.co.uk>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1290 bytes --]
On Jan 6, 2012 8:44 PM, "Stroller" <stroller@stellar.eclipse.co.uk> wrote:
>
>
> On 4 January 2012, at 18:19, Tamer Higazi wrote:
> > …
> > I want to make my linux machine being a wlan access point for my other
> > components like Notebook, Cell phone etc...
>
> If you just want to temporarily share then I think "access point" is
unimportant - can't you use "ad hoc" mode?
>
> "Access point" means getting a wifi card which supports master mode. Not
all do.
>
> I question whether this is worth the bother - routers are just too cheap.
>
> If you want to do something complicated, which is not available in the
menus of your $20 wifi router, then run OpenWRT Linux on a $40 router.
>
> The extra cost of a recent router will quickly pay for itself in
electricity savings, over leaving your big desktop PC on when you only want
to surf the net on your netbook.
>
> Stroller.
>
>
I agree. But I strongly recommend going the OpenWRT route directly.
Proprietary access points, especially the ones supporting WPS, are security
threats :
http://arstechnica.com/business/news/2012/01/hands-on-hacking-wifi-protected-setup-with-reaver.ars
the WPS protocol has been broken. OpenWRT does not support WPS, so it
doesn't have the WPS vulnerability.
Rgds,
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 1699 bytes --]
prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-01-06 15:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-01-04 18:19 [gentoo-user] requirements for a gentoo wlan accesspoint Tamer Higazi
2012-01-04 18:42 ` Michael Mol
2012-01-04 19:09 ` Michael Mathurin
2012-01-04 19:15 ` AW: " Peter Pan
2012-01-06 13:41 ` Stroller
2012-01-06 15:43 ` Pandu Poluan [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAA2qdGX8fhh0bAPff9LgyGPbJzMB4C_4Sqdjq4+-xOLKsums9w@mail.gmail.com \
--to=pandu@poluan.info \
--cc=gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox