From: Pandu Poluan <pandu@poluan.info>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: make of gentoo-sources-3.2.12 fails
Date: Wed, 23 May 2012 13:05:50 +0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAA2qdGX6L3nVz9EmFh7UDjFqSWfXTBJ7yO+=yOAQSNMGa7nRqw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120523041021.5cef3c03@unet.univie.ac.at>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 6168 bytes --]
On May 23, 2012 9:14 AM, "Michael Scherer" <a6702894@unet.univie.ac.at>
wrote:
>
> On Thu, 17 May 2012 22:59:41 +0200
> Alex Schuster <wonko@wonkology.org> wrote:
>
> > Michael Scherer writes:
> >
> > > 1) make output:
> > >
> > > CHK include/linux/version.h
> > > CHK include/generated/utsrelease.h
> > > CALL scripts/checksyscalls.sh
> > > CHK include/generated/compile.h
> > > LD init/mounts.o
> > > ls -Al -m elf_x86_64 -r -o init/mounts.o init/do_mounts.o
> > > init/do_mounts_initrd.o init/mounts.o: No such file or directory
> > > make[1]: *** [init/mounts.o] Error 1
> > > make: *** [init] Error 2
> > >
> > > There is an LD, the ls line is part of the error message.
> >
> > But the options look really more like ld options to me. How this could
> > possibly happen, I don't know. Some overriding of $(LD) perhaps? Does
> > "env | egrep -i 'ls|ld'" show something weird? Does it also fail as a
> > non-root user, after you copied the stuff over to somewhere where this
> > user can write? Just grasping at straws here.
> >
> >
> > > But without doubt you are right that mounts.o is not built, for
> > > whatever reason.
> >
> > Because ld should build it from init/do_mounts.o, but ls is being
> > called instead?
> >
> > > The build command
> > >
> > > init/.do_mounts.o.cmd:cmd_init/do_mounts.o := gcc
> > > -Wp,-MD,init/.do_mounts.o.d -nostdinc
> > > -isystem /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/4.5.3/include
> > > -I/usr/src/linux-3.2.12-gentoo/arch/x86/include
> > > -Iarch/x86/include/generated -Iinclude
> > > -include /usr/src/linux-3.2.12-gentoo/include/linux/kconfig.h
> > > -D__KERNEL__ -Wall -Wundef -Wstrict-prototypes -Wno-trigraphs
> > > -fno-strict-aliasing -fno-common
> > > -Werror-implicit-function-declaration -Wno-format-security
> > > -fno-delete-null-pointer-checks -O2 -m64 -march=k8 -mno-red-zone
> > > -mcmodel=kernel -funit-at-a-time -maccumulate-outgoing-args
> > > -fstack-protector -DCONFIG_AS_CFI=1 -DCONFIG_AS_CFI_SIGNAL_FRAME=1
> > > -DCONFIG_AS_CFI_SECTIONS=1 -DCONFIG_AS_FXSAVEQ=1 -pipe
> > > -Wno-sign-compare -fno-asynchronous-unwind-tables -mno-sse -mno-mmx
> > > -mno-sse2 -mno-3dnow -Wframe-larger-than=2048
> > > -fno-omit-frame-pointer -fno-optimize-sibling-calls
> > > -fno-inline-functions-called-once -Wdeclaration-after-statement
> > > -Wno-pointer-sign -fno-strict-overflow -fconserve-stack
> > > -DCC_HAVE_ASM_GOTO -D"KBUILD_STR(s)=\#s"
> > > -D"KBUILD_BASENAME=KBUILD_STR(do_mounts)"
> > > -D"KBUILD_MODNAME=KBUILD_STR(mounts)" -c -o init/do_mounts.o
> > > init/do_mounts.c
> > >
> > > contains a directive to build mounts.o, see second last line, but
> > > it for some reason this is ignored.
> > > Maybe there is a flaw in that command, only I can't find it.
> >
> > Neither can I. Is this command executed at all? If you maybe replace
> > the 'gcc' by 'gccXXX', does this give an error? Or put an 'echo' in
> > front of the gcc'.
> > You can try 'make -d', this will give you LOTS of debug output, but I
> > don't think you will see the actual commands then.
> >
> > Wonko
> >
>
> Now at last there is some kind of "progress". Last thing I tried was
> replacing my current .config with that of my previous kernel (3.2.1-r2)
> and at least the make ran all the way up to the point where it should
> link everything to build vmlinux, only now it tells me it couldn't
> find vmlinux.o.
>
> The last couple of lines from the make output:
>
> CC arch/x86/lib/cache-smp.o
> CC arch/x86/lib/msr.o
> AS arch/x86/lib/msr-reg.o
> CC arch/x86/lib/msr-reg-export.o
> AS arch/x86/lib/iomap_copy_64.o
> LD arch/x86/lib/built-in.o
> ls -Al -m elf_x86_64 -r -o arch/x86/lib/built-in.o
> arch/x86/lib/msr-smp.o arch/x86/lib/cache-smp.o arch/x86/lib/msr.o
> arch/x86/lib/msr-reg.o arch/x86/lib/msr-reg-export.o
> arch/x86/lib/iomap_copy_64.o
> AS arch/x86/lib/clear_page_64.o
> AS arch/x86/lib/cmpxchg16b_emu.o
> AS arch/x86/lib/copy_page_64.o
> AS arch/x86/lib/copy_user_64.o
> AS arch/x86/lib/copy_user_nocache_64.o
> AS arch/x86/lib/csum-copy_64.o
> CC arch/x86/lib/csum-partial_64.o
> CC arch/x86/lib/csum-wrappers_64.o
> CC arch/x86/lib/delay.o
> AS arch/x86/lib/getuser.o
> GEN arch/x86/lib/inat-tables.c
> CC arch/x86/lib/inat.o
> CC arch/x86/lib/insn.o
> AS arch/x86/lib/memcpy_64.o
> AS arch/x86/lib/memmove_64.o
> AS arch/x86/lib/memset_64.o
> AS arch/x86/lib/putuser.o
> AS arch/x86/lib/rwlock.o
> AS arch/x86/lib/rwsem.o
> AS arch/x86/lib/thunk_64.o
> CC arch/x86/lib/usercopy.o
> CC arch/x86/lib/usercopy_64.o
> AR arch/x86/lib/lib.a
> LD vmlinux.o
> ls -Al -m elf_x86_64 -r -o vmlinux.o arch/x86/kernel/head_64.o
> arch/x86/kernel/head64.o arch/x86/kernel/head.o
> arch/x86/kernel/init_task.o init/built-in.o --start-group
> usr/built-in.o arch/x86/built-in.o kernel/built-in.o mm/built-in.o
> fs/built-in.o ipc/built-in.o security/built-in.o crypto/built-in.o
> block/built-in.o lib/lib.a arch/x86/lib/lib.a lib/built-in.o
> arch/x86/lib/built-in.o drivers/built-in.o sound/built-in.o
> firmware/built-in.o arch/x86/pci/built-in.o arch/x86/power/built-in.o
> arch/x86/video/built-in.o net/built-in.o --end-group
> MODPOST vmlinux.o
> vmlinux.o: No such file or directory make[1]: ***
> [vmlinux.o] Error 1 make: *** [vmlinux.o] Error 2
>
>
> Essentially the same error as previously with mounts.o, and after
> every LD comes an ls -Al ... line like above, which I never saw
> before in my make outputs. Don't know where that comes from.
>
> I'm now back where the troubles began, the vmlinux.o error was
> the first I encountered after my last successful build.
> Maybe a careful search of a diff of the .config files will
> give me some idea.
>
> By now you're probably somewhat tired of devoting your time
> to this problem, so thank you for all your efforts to help me.
> If I ever solve this, you'll hear from me (which doesn't mean
> the thread is closed. If someone is still curious... ;-) )
>
> Kind regards, Michael
>
If the problem is due to .config, run make oldconfig first.
Rgds,
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 8056 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-05-23 9:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 119+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-05-09 8:47 [gentoo-user] Are those "green" drives any good? Dale
2012-05-09 9:25 ` Alan McKinnon
2012-05-09 9:52 ` Dale
2012-05-09 11:32 ` Daniel Troeder
2012-05-09 11:51 ` Dale
2012-05-10 19:39 ` David Haller
2012-05-09 21:28 ` Alan McKinnon
2012-05-09 22:24 ` Dale
2012-05-09 22:48 ` Paul Hartman
2012-05-09 23:49 ` Dale
2012-05-10 1:39 ` Pandu Poluan
2012-05-10 1:52 ` Adam Carter
2012-05-10 12:53 ` Todd Goodman
2012-05-09 23:37 ` Mark Knecht
2012-05-09 23:58 ` Dale
2012-05-10 7:03 ` Mick
2012-05-10 11:55 ` napalm
2012-05-10 12:38 ` Dale
2012-05-10 13:27 ` napalm
2012-05-10 21:39 ` Dale
2012-05-10 22:53 ` Paul Hartman
2012-05-11 0:07 ` Neil Bothwick
2012-05-11 1:10 ` David Haller
2012-05-10 19:38 ` David Haller
2012-05-10 21:13 ` Alan McKinnon
2012-05-09 11:47 ` Tanstaafl
2012-05-09 12:06 ` mike
2012-05-09 13:30 ` Tanstaafl
2012-05-09 12:29 ` Mark Knecht
2012-05-09 16:39 ` Pandu Poluan
2012-05-09 17:28 ` Mark Knecht
2012-05-09 18:42 ` Paul Hartman
2012-05-09 18:53 ` Mark Knecht
2012-05-10 14:20 ` [gentoo-user] make of gentoo-sources-3.2.12 fails Michael Scherer
2012-05-10 14:50 ` Pandu Poluan
2012-05-10 19:57 ` Michael Scherer
2012-05-10 21:08 ` Stroller
2012-05-11 1:01 ` Michael Scherer
2012-05-11 5:18 ` Joshua Murphy
2012-05-11 12:59 ` Michael Scherer
2012-05-11 17:56 ` Michael Scherer
2012-05-11 10:20 ` Alan McKinnon
2012-05-11 22:48 ` [gentoo-user] " walt
2012-05-12 1:31 ` Michael Scherer
2012-05-12 18:17 ` walt
2012-05-14 1:44 ` Michael Scherer
2012-05-14 2:13 ` ny6p01
2012-05-14 15:26 ` Michael Scherer
2012-05-14 15:37 ` Alan McKinnon
2012-05-14 15:52 ` ny6p01
2012-05-26 11:18 ` luis jure
2012-05-26 13:56 ` ny6p01
2012-05-14 16:13 ` Allan Gottlieb
2012-05-14 17:13 ` Dale
2012-05-14 20:54 ` Alan McKinnon
2012-05-15 0:46 ` Dale
2012-05-15 17:01 ` Mark Knecht
2012-05-15 17:15 ` Dale
2012-05-15 21:12 ` Alan McKinnon
2012-05-18 12:29 ` Willie WY Wong
2012-05-15 17:25 ` john
2012-05-15 23:26 ` Peter Humphrey
2012-05-16 0:41 ` Pandu Poluan
2012-05-17 16:14 ` Michael Scherer
2012-05-17 17:05 ` Dale
2012-05-17 19:13 ` Michael Scherer
2012-05-17 17:13 ` Neil Bothwick
2012-05-17 18:58 ` Michael Scherer
2012-05-17 17:47 ` Tanstaafl
2012-05-17 19:14 ` ny6p01
2012-05-17 19:25 ` Alan McKinnon
2012-05-17 23:56 ` Peter Humphrey
2012-05-17 19:29 ` Michael Scherer
2012-05-17 21:10 ` Michael Mol
2012-05-17 18:06 ` Pandu Poluan
2012-05-17 20:13 ` Michael Scherer
2012-05-17 20:50 ` Hinnerk van Bruinehsen
2012-05-21 3:24 ` Joshua Murphy
2012-07-03 11:11 ` [gentoo-user] Re: make of gentoo-sources-3.2.12 fails [SOLVED] Michael Scherer
2012-05-17 20:51 ` [gentoo-user] Re: make of gentoo-sources-3.2.12 fails Michael Scherer
2012-05-17 20:59 ` Alex Schuster
2012-05-23 2:10 ` Michael Scherer
2012-05-23 6:05 ` Pandu Poluan [this message]
2012-05-19 3:18 ` Volker Armin Hemmann
2012-05-19 16:59 ` Arttu V.
2012-05-26 11:33 ` luis jure
2012-05-14 18:25 ` Tanstaafl
2012-05-14 19:11 ` Alecks Gates
2012-05-14 19:23 ` Michael Mol
2012-05-15 0:03 ` Pandu Poluan
2012-05-15 0:05 ` Alecks Gates
2012-05-15 0:16 ` Pandu Poluan
2012-05-14 20:51 ` Alan McKinnon
2012-05-14 21:01 ` Michael Mol
2012-05-14 21:24 ` Alan McKinnon
2012-05-14 21:53 ` Neil Bothwick
2012-05-14 23:23 ` Alan McKinnon
2012-05-14 23:35 ` Michael Mol
2012-05-14 23:26 ` Michael Mol
2012-05-14 23:55 ` Pandu Poluan
2012-05-14 21:56 ` Neil Bothwick
2012-05-09 13:15 ` [gentoo-user] Are those "green" drives any good? Volker Armin Hemmann
2012-05-09 22:37 ` Dale
2012-05-10 16:20 ` Norman Invasion
2012-05-10 18:01 ` Mark Knecht
2012-05-10 18:13 ` Norman Invasion
2012-05-10 18:51 ` Mark Knecht
2012-05-12 9:34 ` Mick
2012-05-12 9:49 ` Volker Armin Hemmann
2012-05-13 9:35 ` David Haller
2012-05-10 19:24 ` David Haller
2012-05-11 1:15 ` Bill Kenworthy
2012-05-12 18:50 ` Frank Steinmetzger
2012-05-13 9:38 ` David Haller
2012-05-21 21:05 ` Frank Steinmetzger
2012-05-21 22:44 ` Andrew Hoffman
2012-05-10 19:36 ` David Haller
2012-05-10 21:25 ` Neil Bothwick
2012-05-10 20:17 ` Mark Knecht
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAA2qdGX6L3nVz9EmFh7UDjFqSWfXTBJ7yO+=yOAQSNMGa7nRqw@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=pandu@poluan.info \
--cc=gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox