From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04CA71381F3 for ; Thu, 19 Sep 2013 07:45:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 462C8E0C98; Thu, 19 Sep 2013 07:45:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from svr-us4.tirtonadi.com (svr-us4.tirtonadi.com [69.65.43.212]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5BB0CE0C8F for ; Thu, 19 Sep 2013 07:45:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ve0-f178.google.com ([209.85.128.178]:33620) by svr-us4.tirtonadi.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.80.1) (envelope-from ) id 1VMYvH-000SQo-CH for gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org; Thu, 19 Sep 2013 14:45:11 +0700 Received: by mail-ve0-f178.google.com with SMTP id jw12so6386475veb.23 for ; Thu, 19 Sep 2013 00:45:09 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=HL7Zo9Q/sccW3k9wyuBN4+Bpaik/0k2V/R9GtUu8/jo=; b=mMmSL/ZaXQH8S/cehuAtMAcJoKUZysbh4z8Z7yK0e9tmx4Hx4IxDiEHyfucuuZsDaP 1FFz4p6ViI57cIPX2nXdyczkQ8wc1C8kgVWzgP3KX697zDbs294rWIbvMDBRps0JKPH3 9BRbNonz4rCL71F32lPeuNQfNkrUd1spb0YlnRrP6r+SZ4ZyR/ngiadsPKkRycXPem0y KxEJxtMEqN2opO3ozaBRQCtoWqyOI7T0nzc/gfClSHP0VV29WbP5k0BFmrlnBEL6tqYi I6qDKvXC36PZXwpLtcvJJhWF7fsRvFq6zRblSV/SJ1SKTcmPk2EKEGkO/5tlIXyTc0sa T3KA== Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.220.42.140 with SMTP id s12mr49182vce.33.1379576709323; Thu, 19 Sep 2013 00:45:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.220.163.69 with HTTP; Thu, 19 Sep 2013 00:45:09 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <523AAA64.8030902@gmail.com> References: <5239B043.1040202@xunil.at> <523A4D24.3030002@gmail.com> <523AAA64.8030902@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2013 14:45:09 +0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] ZFS From: Pandu Poluan To: gentoo-user Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - svr-us4.tirtonadi.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - lists.gentoo.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - poluan.info X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: svr-us4.tirtonadi.com: authenticated_id: rileyer+pandu.poluan.info/only user confirmed/virtual account not confirmed X-Archives-Salt: bc15d456-72cb-4ece-98ad-8db1eb3a9728 X-Archives-Hash: d00bf654f2a206f2d4602a24062a056d On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 2:40 PM, Dale wrote: > Grant wrote: >>>> Interesting news related to ZFS: >>>> >>>> http://open-zfs.org/wiki/Main_Page >>> I wonder if this will be added to the kernel at some point in the >>> future? May even be their intention? >> I think the CDDL license is what's keeping ZFS out of the kernel, >> although some argue that it should be integrated anyway. OpenZFS >> retains the same license. >> >> - Grant >> >> . >> > > Then I wonder why it seems to have forked? > At the moment, only to 'decouple' ZFS development from Illumos development. Changing a license require the approval of all rightsholders, and that takes time. At least, with a decoupling, ZFS can quickly improve to fulfill the needs of its users, no longer depending on Illumos' dev cycle. Rgds, --=20 FdS Pandu E Poluan ~ IT Optimizer ~ =E2=80=A2 LOPSA Member #15248 =E2=80=A2 Blog : http://pepoluan.tumblr.com =E2=80=A2 Linked-In : http://id.linkedin.com/in/pepoluan