From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1RAw09-0006Tp-HF for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 04 Oct 2011 03:49:13 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 638C921C12A; Tue, 4 Oct 2011 03:48:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from svr-us4.tirtonadi.com (svr-us4.tirtonadi.com [69.65.43.212]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B001821C088 for ; Tue, 4 Oct 2011 03:48:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-bw0-f53.google.com ([209.85.214.53]) by svr-us4.tirtonadi.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RAvz6-000bqU-D2 for Gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org; Tue, 04 Oct 2011 10:48:00 +0700 Received: by bkbzt12 with SMTP id zt12so150672bkb.40 for ; Mon, 03 Oct 2011 20:47:56 -0700 (PDT) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.223.17.219 with SMTP id t27mr960849faa.123.1317700076614; Mon, 03 Oct 2011 20:47:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.223.74.196 with HTTP; Mon, 3 Oct 2011 20:47:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.223.74.196 with HTTP; Mon, 3 Oct 2011 20:47:56 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 4 Oct 2011 10:47:56 +0700 Message-ID: Subject: [gentoo-user] What is the most error resistant filesystem? From: Pandu Poluan To: gentoo-user Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001517440f66fcb4a004ae70f400 X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - svr-us4.tirtonadi.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - lists.gentoo.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - poluan.info X-Archives-Salt: X-Archives-Hash: 460d3c75ca2563808548afb2a079a0a9 --001517440f66fcb4a004ae70f400 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Hello people! Now, I have the same question as this guy: https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=66651 I.e., what is the most robust filesystem for Linux? The box will be used as a gateway/firewall for a branch office, so I really couldn't care less about filesystem performance. But the utility power there is horrendous, so I need something that can shrug off a catastrophic power loss, and/or very fast fsck. I'd also appreciate any tips on mount options to further enhance robustness. TIA! Rgds, --001517440f66fcb4a004ae70f400 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hello people!

Now, I have the same question as this guy:

https://b= bs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=3D66651

I.e., what is the most robust filesystem for Linux?

The box will be used as a gateway/firewall for a branch office, so I rea= lly couldn't care less about filesystem performance. But the utility po= wer there is horrendous, so I need something that can shrug off a catastrop= hic power loss, and/or very fast fsck.

I'd also appreciate any tips on mount options to further enhance rob= ustness.

TIA!

Rgds,

--001517440f66fcb4a004ae70f400--