From: Pandu Poluan <pandu@poluan.info>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Can no longer use symlinks in /etc/init.d with openrc-0.9.8.4 ?
Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2012 18:39:16 +0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAA2qdGWxYkZ031kGo17t2wjHza+WjosFp0VgXaPkNo_ockEEyA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4F3CE471.6070606@binarywings.net>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3379 bytes --]
On Feb 16, 2012 6:14 PM, "Florian Philipp" <lists@binarywings.net> wrote:
>
> Am 16.02.2012 11:12, schrieb Pandu Poluan:
> >
> > On Feb 16, 2012 3:33 PM, "J. Roeleveld" <joost@antarean.org
> > <mailto:joost@antarean.org>> wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> On Thu, February 16, 2012 6:24 am, Pandu Poluan wrote:
> >> > I am wondering if any of you had experienced the same difficulty as
me:
> >> >
> >> > A couple of days ago, I upgraded openrc from (whatever version it was
> >> > previously) to 0.9.8.4.
> >> >
> >> > One of the scripts in /etc/init.d was a symlink to
> > /opt/some/package/path
> >> >
> >> > (To be precise, /etc/init.d/gatewall ->
> >> > /opt/wallmator/initscripts/gentoo/gatewall.init)
> >> >
> >> > ((wallmator is a "Firewall Automator" script I'm developing))
> >> >
> >> > This morning, I rebooted. Upon time to execute the "gatewall" script,
> >> > it complained that some settings (set through /etc/conf.d/gatewall
are
> >> > not set). I double-checked the settings it complained; yep, they are
> >> > there in /etc/conf.d/gatewall.
> >> >
> >> > I tried `/etc/init.d/gatewall start`, no luck. It still complains of
> >> > some vital non-optional settings not being set.
> >> >
> >> > So, I replaced the symlink:
> >> >
> >> > cd /etc/init.d
> >> > mv gatewall gatewall.old
> >> > cp /opt/wallmator/initscripts/gentoo/gatewall.init gatewall
> >> >
> >> > And tried again `/etc/init.d/gatewall start` ... it worked!!
> >> >
> >> > So I tried `shutdown -r now` ... there's joy in Mudville! The
> >> > "gatewall" initscript now properly reads the settings in
> >> > /etc/conf.d/gatewall.
> >> >
> >> > My question is: Is there a change of behavior in how openrc executes
a
> >> > script in /etc/init.d/ when said script is a symlink instead of a
> >> > 'normal' file?
> >> >
> >> > PS: For this particular system, everything under / except /boot
> >> > resides in the same filesystem.
> >> >
> >> > PPS: For the contents of the "gatewall" initscript, see
> >> >
> >
https://bitbucket.org/pepoluan/wallmator/src/edae2e294d07/initscript/gentoo/gatewall.init
> >> >
> >> > Rgds,
> >> > --
> >> > FdS Pandu E Poluan
> >> > ~ IT Optimizer ~
> >> >
> >> >  • LOPSA Member #15248
> >> >  • Blog : http://pepoluan.tumblr.com
> >> >  • Linked-In : http://id.linkedin.com/in/pepoluan
> >> >
> >>
> >> Pandu,
> >>
> >> I haven't checked the source yet, but I'm wondering if the scripts are
> >> looking for the "conf.d" file in the location:
> >> " ../conf.d " (based from the actual location of the init-script)
> >>
> >> Can you try the following:
> >> # mkdir -p /opt/wallmator/initscripts/conf.d
> >> # ln -s /etc/init.d/gatewall /opt/wallmator/initscripts/conf.d/gatewall
> >>
> >> and then recreate the original link for the init-script.
> >>
> >
> > IIRC, it's the responsibility of runscript to source the relevant config
> > file in /etc/conf.d, and not the initscript's.
> >
> > If you peruse the code, you can see that I relied on that feature; there
> > is no source-ing of any file in /etc/conf.d
> >
> > Rgds,
> >
>
> Yes, but maybe runscript resolves the real file location and then
> sources the conf file relative to that location.
>
Most likely. Didn't use to be like that, though.
Oh well, I'll just add an explicit source then.
Rgds,
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 5076 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-02-16 11:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-02-16 5:24 [gentoo-user] Can no longer use symlinks in /etc/init.d with openrc-0.9.8.4 ? Pandu Poluan
2012-02-16 6:57 ` Willie Matthews
2012-02-16 7:09 ` Pandu Poluan
2012-02-16 8:34 ` J. Roeleveld
2012-02-16 10:12 ` Pandu Poluan
2012-02-16 11:11 ` Florian Philipp
2012-02-16 11:39 ` Pandu Poluan [this message]
2012-02-16 11:51 ` J. Roeleveld
2012-02-16 12:32 ` Pandu Poluan
2012-02-16 11:57 ` Neil Bothwick
2012-02-16 12:35 ` Pandu Poluan
2012-02-16 13:38 ` Neil Bothwick
2012-02-16 16:14 ` Pandu Poluan
2012-02-16 20:31 ` Neil Bothwick
2012-03-18 22:14 ` William Hubbs
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAA2qdGWxYkZ031kGo17t2wjHza+WjosFp0VgXaPkNo_ockEEyA@mail.gmail.com \
--to=pandu@poluan.info \
--cc=gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox