* [gentoo-user] What happened to Qt 5?
@ 2014-05-27 5:32 Nikos Chantziaras
2014-05-27 7:56 ` Alan McKinnon
2014-05-27 16:33 ` Pandu Poluan
0 siblings, 2 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Nikos Chantziaras @ 2014-05-27 5:32 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-user
Wasn't it supposed to hit portage a long time ago? Any news? There's
zero information on the http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/desktop/qt site.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-user] What happened to Qt 5?
2014-05-27 5:32 [gentoo-user] What happened to Qt 5? Nikos Chantziaras
@ 2014-05-27 7:56 ` Alan McKinnon
2014-05-27 16:33 ` Pandu Poluan
1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Alan McKinnon @ 2014-05-27 7:56 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-user
On 27/05/2014 07:32, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
> Wasn't it supposed to hit portage a long time ago? Any news? There's
> zero information on the http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/desktop/qt site.
>
>
>
>
Last I heard it was still in the kde overlay and when it moves to
portage new categories qt-* will be created; probably to avoid
clobbering qt4 and confusing kde ebuilds.
I read that on a blog somewhere recently, probably planet. And as usual,
I can't find it now when I look for it
--
Alan McKinnon
alan.mckinnon@gmail.com
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-user] What happened to Qt 5?
2014-05-27 5:32 [gentoo-user] What happened to Qt 5? Nikos Chantziaras
2014-05-27 7:56 ` Alan McKinnon
@ 2014-05-27 16:33 ` Pandu Poluan
1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Pandu Poluan @ 2014-05-27 16:33 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-user
On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 12:32 PM, Nikos Chantziaras <realnc@gmail.com> wrote:
> Wasn't it supposed to hit portage a long time ago? Any news? There's zero
> information on the http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/desktop/qt site.
>
>
I see many blockers in the "[TRACKER] Qt5 in portage" bug [0].
I do believe the KDE project team monitors Qt5-in-tree closely [1].
[0] https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=454132
[1] http://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Project:KDE/Frameworks
Rgds,
--
FdS Pandu E Poluan
~ IT Optimizer ~
• LOPSA Member #15248
• Blog : http://pandu.poluan.info/blog/
• Linked-In : http://id.linkedin.com/in/pepoluan
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-user] What happened to Qt 5?
[not found] <nmihb-77i-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
@ 2014-05-27 17:47 ` wireless
2014-05-30 7:57 ` john
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: wireless @ 2014-05-27 17:47 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-user
On 05/27/14 00:40, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
> Wasn't it supposed to hit portage a long time ago? Any news? There's
> zero information on the http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/desktop/qt site.
I run lxde on one desktop; and my experimental results are nothing short
of fabulous. A while back they (LXDE and razor-qt projects) decided to
merge and support QT5. [1] If you have a spare desktop, you might want
to experiment with QT5 via LXDE-QT [2].
I have not inquired when "LXDE-QT" known also as LXQT will formerly
appear in portage; I can't remember where I read rumblings about it.
I have just now looked for an overlay [3].
I do like the new (old_school?) approach of LXde and it's resource
footprint is very, very small. qt is a fine piece of work; I have
issues with the KDE "vision" and LXQT seems to be reading my mind
on what a gui environment should and should not do, imho.
Lightweight X means it could and should run in many places, easily and
securely, like in a VM environment, tablets, etc etc.
hth,
James
[1] http://wiki.lxde.org/en/Migrate_from_GTK%2B_to_Qt
[2] http://wiki.lxde.org/en/Build_LXDE-Qt_From_Source
[3] https://github.com/mika-k/lxqt-overlay
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-user] What happened to Qt 5?
2014-05-27 17:47 ` wireless
@ 2014-05-30 7:57 ` john
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: john @ 2014-05-30 7:57 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-user
On Tue, 27 May 2014 12:47:07 -0500
wireless@tampabay.rr.com wrote:
> On 05/27/14 00:40, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
> > Wasn't it supposed to hit portage a long time ago? Any news? There's
> > zero information on the http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/desktop/qt
> > site.
>
>
> I run lxde on one desktop; and my experimental results are nothing
> short of fabulous. A while back they (LXDE and razor-qt projects)
> decided to merge and support QT5. [1] If you have a spare desktop,
> you might want to experiment with QT5 via LXDE-QT [2].
>
>
> I have not inquired when "LXDE-QT" known also as LXQT will formerly
> appear in portage; I can't remember where I read rumblings about it.
> I have just now looked for an overlay [3].
>
> I do like the new (old_school?) approach of LXde and it's resource
> footprint is very, very small. qt is a fine piece of work; I have
> issues with the KDE "vision" and LXQT seems to be reading my mind
> on what a gui environment should and should not do, imho.
>
> Lightweight X means it could and should run in many places, easily
> and securely, like in a VM environment, tablets, etc etc.
>
>
> hth,
> James
>
>
> [1] http://wiki.lxde.org/en/Migrate_from_GTK%2B_to_Qt
>
> [2] http://wiki.lxde.org/en/Build_LXDE-Qt_From_Source
>
> [3] https://github.com/mika-k/lxqt-overlay
>
lxqt is up and running in Gentoo. It's listed in packages.
The only problem I had was emerging lxqt-panel but just had to change a use flag of lxqt-panel from quicklauch to
-quicklaunch and it emerged. No problems with anything else and desktop
is good.
--
John D Maunder
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2014-05-30 7:57 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2014-05-27 5:32 [gentoo-user] What happened to Qt 5? Nikos Chantziaras
2014-05-27 7:56 ` Alan McKinnon
2014-05-27 16:33 ` Pandu Poluan
[not found] <nmihb-77i-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
2014-05-27 17:47 ` wireless
2014-05-30 7:57 ` john
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox