From: Pandu Poluan <pandu@poluan.info>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Progress on s/udev/mdev/
Date: Sun, 20 Nov 2011 11:33:23 +0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAA2qdGWjC1a_0pw_qTNoZAYqr8vPRw=rZY1XvxCnphkJBj817g@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4EC879CE.5000202@gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1341 bytes --]
On Nov 20, 2011 10:56 AM, "Dale" <rdalek1967@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Pandu Poluan wrote:
>>
>> So, any progress/updates on the attempt to replace udev with busybox's
mdev?
>>
>> As for my case, it's working well on XenServer and VMware ESX /
>> vSphere (haven't found the time to test a VirtualBox installation
>> yet).
>>
>> Except for one annoyance:
>>
>> Now, I've done the steps put forth by waltdnes here:
>>
>> http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/user/242563
>>
>> ... but every "eix-sync&& emerge -avuD @world" finds me having to
>>
>> re-edit /usr/portage/virtual/dev-manager/dev-manager-0.ebuild, or else
>> portage wants to emerge sys-apps/makedev and sys-fs/static-dev
>>
>> Is there a way to 'force' portage to use the edited
>> dev-manager-0.ebuild and not the original version pulled in by
>> eix-sync?
>>
>> Rgds,
>
>
>
> Question: Is this going to be added to the shiney new Gentoo wiki at
some point? The wiki needs some more content for sure. ;-)
>
> I didn't know if ya'll had thought of this before or not.
>
Well, although I can't read @waltdnes' mind, I'm sure he has that in mind.
We're still ironing out the showstoppers. As soon as the generic
glitches/annoyances (e.g., my 'fight' against portage reverting the .ebuild
edits) are handled, I'm sure a w.g.o article will automagically appears ;-)
Rgds,
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 1921 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-11-20 4:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-11-18 11:33 [gentoo-user] Progress on s/udev/mdev/ Pandu Poluan
2011-11-18 22:38 ` Paul Colquhoun
2011-11-18 23:53 ` Neil Bothwick
2011-11-19 1:41 ` Pandu Poluan
2011-11-19 4:55 ` waltdnes
2011-11-19 5:21 ` Pandu Poluan
2011-11-20 2:24 ` [gentoo-user] " Steven J Long
2011-11-20 3:24 ` [gentoo-user] " Pandu Poluan
2011-11-20 3:53 ` Dale
2011-11-20 4:33 ` Pandu Poluan [this message]
2011-11-21 10:22 ` waltdnes
2011-11-21 10:34 ` Pandu Poluan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAA2qdGWjC1a_0pw_qTNoZAYqr8vPRw=rZY1XvxCnphkJBj817g@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=pandu@poluan.info \
--cc=gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox