From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9044A1381F3 for ; Sun, 7 Jul 2013 18:36:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id EEA5CE09CB; Sun, 7 Jul 2013 18:36:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from svr-us4.tirtonadi.com (svr-us4.tirtonadi.com [69.65.43.212]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B1BBDE09AE for ; Sun, 7 Jul 2013 18:36:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-vb0-f51.google.com ([209.85.212.51]:35713) by svr-us4.tirtonadi.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1UvtpE-003g78-HX for gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org; Mon, 08 Jul 2013 01:36:44 +0700 Received: by mail-vb0-f51.google.com with SMTP id x17so2817823vbf.24 for ; Sun, 07 Jul 2013 11:36:39 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=ArUBQGgYKr2M7SArVfJPRcjWck098SBli/jEvT6V24U=; b=jH3EtSiwmfftO6nuhL6vrGbKlD3dy2WxBmGDJUKOeL9rySNx0NN8I9dqI5mT9yvSKc X+3qjRvMdwvM73puaJH4A6BKmN+J+TMEkU20Znc9EKlpK2RX521ZlqmbBbFv2QRbIbsW bCzOlafYZaqG39fV1vXWMfXkEPLjOLAAtI4WXN0ES4W7pPXGED1whzd/Uoo+MRZXvwMF +WJovDoAIyh+5W9z09tZBF3KY7BCRZdpQ6HOc9NrX1cTPm/aXYORhGukQY6FK74Hlhcy AStFEtABmQ5PS620tUdxIQTETSYpareTcbnHXLZdc7VMcia02UqRPqAfG0Ttysv0+9Wy CGog== Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.59.0.2 with SMTP id au2mr12107172ved.83.1373222199162; Sun, 07 Jul 2013 11:36:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.220.187.201 with HTTP; Sun, 7 Jul 2013 11:36:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.220.187.201 with HTTP; Sun, 7 Jul 2013 11:36:38 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20130707180446.GU3387@server> References: <51D728BA.4060906@gmail.com> <51D73FFF.9020200@iinet.net.au> <51D746E5.1040606@gmail.com> <51D7DA60.6010203@gmail.com> <20130706121230.GK3387@server> <51D99257.5000500@libertytrek.org> <20130707180446.GU3387@server> Date: Mon, 8 Jul 2013 01:36:38 +0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Linux viruses From: Pandu Poluan To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7bd750b260ff0c04e0f035c3 X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - svr-us4.tirtonadi.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - lists.gentoo.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - poluan.info X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: svr-us4.tirtonadi.com: authenticated_id: rileyer+pandu.poluan.info/only user confirmed/virtual account not confirmed X-Archives-Salt: 6283ce97-5c49-49c4-bcec-dd3c21c9f8dd X-Archives-Hash: 6e1e96e36c8af55a9c065157a72651a0 --047d7bd750b260ff0c04e0f035c3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Jul 8, 2013 1:05 AM, "Bruce Hill" wrote: > > On Sun, Jul 07, 2013 at 12:07:51PM -0400, Tanstaafl wrote: > > On 2013-07-06 8:12 AM, Bruce Hill wrote: > > > NB: I only sell the best A/V software on the market, which hasn't > > > missed a virus in the wild since it's inception. > > > > Not to start a flamewar on which is the best AV, but I'm curious which > > one this is? > > http://www.eset.com/us/home/whyeset/compare/ Oh. My. Goodness! ESET! I *love* that piece of gold :-) In fact, I'm still having the glow from the satisfaction of successfully convincing the management to replace the previous p.o.s. that goes by the name of "SEP", with this wonderful antivirus. The first week, ESET unearthed more than 1'000 threats (throughout the company) that SEP had turned a blind eye to. It's really a mystery how SEP ever got crowned with any "Good" attributes. Granted, the "Business" version has much more options than one can shake a stick at, but for control-happy BOFHs, ESET is a godsend, a breath of fresh air compared to the CPU-guzzling ineffective p.o.s. called SEP. (sorry for the tangential offtopicness, I'm just so very glad to see a fellow ESET-believer ;-) ). Rgds, -- --047d7bd750b260ff0c04e0f035c3 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable


On Jul 8, 2013 1:05 AM, "Bruce Hill" <daddy@happypenguincomputers.com> wrote: >
> On Sun, Jul 07, 2013 at 12:07:51PM -0400, Tanstaafl wrote:
> > On 2013-07-06 8:12 AM, Bruce Hill <daddy@happypenguincomputers.com> wrote:
> > > NB: I only sell the best A/V software on the market, which h= asn't
> > > missed a virus in the =C2=A0wild since it's inception. > >
> > Not to start a flamewar on which is the best AV, but I'm curi= ous which
> > one this is?
>
> http://www.es= et.com/us/home/whyeset/compare/

Oh. My. Goodness! ESET! I *love* that piece of gold :-)

In fact, I'm still having the glow from the satisfaction= of successfully convincing the management to replace the previous p.o.s. t= hat goes by the name of "SEP", with this wonderful antivirus.

The first week, ESET unearthed more than 1'000 threats (= throughout the company) that SEP had turned a blind eye to. It's really= a mystery how SEP ever got crowned with any "Good" attributes.

Granted, the "Business" version has much more opti= ons than one can shake a stick at, but for control-happy BOFHs, ESET is a g= odsend, a breath of fresh air compared to the CPU-guzzling ineffective p.o.= s. called SEP.

(sorry for the tangential offtopicness, I'm just so very= glad to see a fellow ESET-believer ;-) ).

Rgds,
--

--047d7bd750b260ff0c04e0f035c3--