From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1QqzO8-0000ZR-LW for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 10 Aug 2011 03:23:24 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 83EAF21C0A9; Wed, 10 Aug 2011 03:23:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from svr-us4.tirtonadi.com (unknown [69.65.43.212]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D72B821C025 for ; Wed, 10 Aug 2011 03:22:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-fx0-f53.google.com ([209.85.161.53]) by svr-us4.tirtonadi.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QqzN4-002t12-8n for gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org; Wed, 10 Aug 2011 10:22:18 +0700 Received: by fxd23 with SMTP id 23so766595fxd.40 for ; Tue, 09 Aug 2011 20:22:14 -0700 (PDT) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.223.50.131 with SMTP id z3mr10458115faf.127.1312946534003; Tue, 09 Aug 2011 20:22:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.223.100.4 with HTTP; Tue, 9 Aug 2011 20:22:13 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4E41DB8C.3010007@gmail.com> References: <4E41DB8C.3010007@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2011 10:22:13 +0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Which gcc unstable? From: Pandu Poluan To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - svr-us4.tirtonadi.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - lists.gentoo.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - poluan.info X-Archives-Salt: X-Archives-Hash: 4f6984cdb18d4b06d101fcc20ffb2c90 On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 08:14, Dale wrote: > Pandu Poluan wrote: >> >> I noticed Dale's email (hi Dale!) [1] asking about which gcc / glibc >> unstable to use. >> >> Is there any consensus yet as to which 'gcc'? I'm planning on doing an >> `emerge -e @system` on two fresh installs, one x86 and the other >> amd64. >> >> Should I go with 4.5.3? Or 4.5.2? Or play it safe and use 4.5.1-r1 >> (which, based on b.g.o search [2], seems to have less (serious) bugs >> compared to 4.5.2) >> > > Howdy, > > I'm using this: > > root@fireball / # equery list gcc glibc > =C2=A0* Searching for gcc ... > [IP-] [ =C2=A0] sys-devel/gcc-4.4.5:4.4 > [IP-] [ =C2=A0] sys-devel/gcc-4.5.3:4.5 > So, 4.5.3 is quite safe for day-to-day usage eh? Okay, keywording it. Thanks! > =C2=A0* Searching for glibc ... > [IP-] [ =C2=A0] sys-libs/glibc-2.13-r4:2.2 > root@fireball / # > > The higher gcc is the one in use. =C2=A0Everything compiles fine. =C2=A0O= ne thing tho, > I started a download and went to town. =C2=A0When I got back, I was sitti= ng at my > grub menu. =C2=A0Most likely not related but wanted to mention juuuuuuuuu= st in > case. =C2=A0;-) =C2=A0Yea, my reboot issues is happening again. =C2=A0:-@ > Hmmm, just a hunch: Have you tried updating the motherboard's firmware? Rgds, --=20 Pandu E Poluan ~ IT Optimizer ~ =C2=A0=E2=80=A2 Blog : http://pepoluan.tumblr.com =C2=A0=E2=80=A2 Linked-In : http://id.linkedin.com/in/pepoluan