From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1QdgDr-0003IJ-Vq for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 04 Jul 2011 10:17:48 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0702221C08F; Mon, 4 Jul 2011 10:15:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from svr-us4.tirtonadi.com (unknown [69.65.43.212]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB6BB21C08F for ; Mon, 4 Jul 2011 10:15:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ey0-f181.google.com ([209.85.215.181]) by svr-us4.tirtonadi.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QdgBr-003pF5-TZ for gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org; Mon, 04 Jul 2011 17:15:44 +0700 Received: by eyh5 with SMTP id 5so1929969eyh.40 for ; Mon, 04 Jul 2011 03:15:41 -0700 (PDT) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.14.127.78 with SMTP id c54mr1671218eei.189.1309774541228; Mon, 04 Jul 2011 03:15:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.14.189.12 with HTTP; Mon, 4 Jul 2011 03:15:41 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20110704082234.173a34d7@zaphod.digimed.co.uk> References: <20110704082234.173a34d7@zaphod.digimed.co.uk> Date: Mon, 4 Jul 2011 17:15:41 +0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Portknock before Postfix delivery? From: Pandu Poluan To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - svr-us4.tirtonadi.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - lists.gentoo.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - poluan.info X-Archives-Salt: X-Archives-Hash: 6b51af061523661ac58550dce12c04a7 On Mon, Jul 4, 2011 at 14:22, Neil Bothwick wrote: > On Mon, 4 Jul 2011 08:31:10 +0700, Pandu Poluan wrote: > >> If that is not possible, what solution would you recommend to 'harden' >> the non-25 mail port? > > Postgrey. > Mmmm... no thanks. I'm trying to save the puny bandwidth incoming to my office :-) Rgds, --=20 Pandu E Poluan ~ IT Optimizer ~ Visit my Blog: http://pepoluan.posterous.com Google Talk:=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 pepoluan Y! messenger: pepoluan MSN / Live:=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 pepoluan@hotmail.com (do not send= email here) Skype:=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 pe= poluan