From: Pandu Poluan <pandu@poluan.info>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Somewhat OT: Any truth to this mess?
Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2012 19:56:40 +0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAA2qdGWNE5WEuX4nWO0n-y0hP1h5m+6J8991D-z6qfx8DHrWVQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1971113.3a2zZ3o5ps@localhost>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2697 bytes --]
On Feb 18, 2012 7:27 PM, "Volker Armin Hemmann" <volkerarmin@googlemail.com>
wrote:
>
> Am Samstag, 18. Februar 2012, 06:00:00 schrieb Dale:
> > Alan McKinnon wrote:
> > > On Sat, 18 Feb 2012 04:26:02 -0600
> > >
> > > Dale <rdalek1967@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >> Howdy,
> > >>
> > >> I ran across this and though it was a joke. Did a news search and
> > >> sure enough, it is reported in lots of places. Random linky:
> > >>
> > >>
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2102856/Will-FBI-shut-Internet-Ma
> > >> rch-8-virus-concerns.html?ito=feeds-newsxml
> > >>
> > >> Is there any truth to this mess? My bigger and better question, how
> > >> is shutting down the internet going to fix this? When the net comes
> > >> back up, they are still going to be infected. Right?
> > >>
> > >> I'm glad I run a really nice Linux OS.
> > >
> > > Gawd, I hate it when morons write sensational articles that attempt to
> > > make sense to other morons. You get crap like that.
> > >
> > > So if this is legit, and I'm not saying it is, what happened is this:
> > >
> > > The malware changes the DNS cache settings on infected machines,
> > > sending the user to rogue caches. The FBI captured some (or all) of
> > > these rogue caches and (possibly) tried to fix them. A court has now
> > > said those rogue caches must now be shut down.
> > >
> > > So if the morons reading the article do nothing, on March 8 the DNS
> > > caches they use will be down. The user's DNS will not work.
> > >
> > > OMFG!!!!!!! Da intartubes is broken!!!!!
> > >
> > > <sigh>
> > >
> > > Instead, why not just set the DNS caches to something NOT owned by
Ivan
> > > The Russian Spammer?
> > >
> > > And no, the intartubes will NOT be switched off.
> >
> > I don't really think they can unless they just cut power to all the
> > computers. After all, the internet is supposed to be redundant right?
> > If there is a few computers still running that have a connection, it is
> > still working. Sort of anyway.
> >
> > Does make one wonder tho. They have been talking about having a
> > internet "off switch" but I'm not sure it would be that easy.
>
> basically, yes. Take down the core routers and backbones and everything
falls
> apart.
>
> --
> #163933
>
Indeed. In fact, easier than that.
Just inject false BGP routes into one of the backbone level routers, and
see how wide the Internet becomes 'impacted'. Do it to maybe 5 or 6 other
routers that watch guard over the transatlantic and transpacific routes,
and watch as the Internet fold upon itself.
I was once a certified Network Engineer before I became a System Admin, so
I know. The soft underbelly of the Intartubes is depressingly very
vulnerable.
Rgds,
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 3741 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-02-18 12:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-02-18 10:26 [gentoo-user] Somewhat OT: Any truth to this mess? Dale
2012-02-18 10:44 ` Alan McKinnon
2012-02-18 12:00 ` Dale
2012-02-18 12:24 ` Volker Armin Hemmann
2012-02-18 12:39 ` Dale
2012-02-18 14:40 ` Alan McKinnon
2012-02-18 15:34 ` Dale
2012-02-18 16:18 ` Michael Mol
2012-02-18 17:48 ` Dale
2012-02-18 18:01 ` Pandu Poluan
2012-02-18 18:10 ` Michael Mol
2012-02-18 19:02 ` Pandu Poluan
2012-02-18 16:21 ` Volker Armin Hemmann
2012-02-18 16:31 ` Michael Mol
2012-02-18 12:56 ` Pandu Poluan [this message]
2012-02-18 13:18 ` Dale
2012-02-18 13:49 ` Pandu Poluan
2012-02-18 14:38 ` Alan McKinnon
2012-02-19 21:08 ` [gentoo-user] " walt
2012-02-19 21:23 ` Paul Hartman
2012-02-19 22:16 ` Dale
2012-02-20 16:12 ` Todd Goodman
2012-02-20 20:49 ` Grant Edwards
2012-02-20 21:04 ` Michael Mol
2012-02-20 21:16 ` Mark Knecht
2012-02-20 21:24 ` Michael Mol
2012-02-20 21:52 ` Grant Edwards
2012-02-21 5:30 ` Paul Hartman
2012-02-18 14:30 ` [gentoo-user] " pk
2012-02-21 3:58 ` Walter Dnes
2012-02-18 14:36 ` Alan McKinnon
2012-02-18 18:11 ` Pandu Poluan
2012-02-18 18:24 ` Michael Mol
2012-02-18 19:10 ` Pandu Poluan
2012-02-18 16:35 ` Mike Edenfield
2012-02-19 21:14 ` [gentoo-user] " walt
2012-02-19 23:29 ` wdk@moriah
2012-02-20 16:37 ` Todd Goodman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAA2qdGWNE5WEuX4nWO0n-y0hP1h5m+6J8991D-z6qfx8DHrWVQ@mail.gmail.com \
--to=pandu@poluan.info \
--cc=gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox